Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD 64 Processor
Word :    Username :           
 

I am very disappointed in Tom’s hardware for posting a comparison of the new Athlon 64 FX-51 and the Athlon 64. Unfortunate that they would rather meet deadlines than report the truth! Here to prove my point check this review out http://www.tech-report.com/ . The Tech Report seems to have gotten their act together and their technicians seem to have what it takes when putting together test systems. The new AMD 64 smokes Intel in this report. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tom’s Hardware were a subdivision of Intel!
AMD Forever!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I counted them, bechmarks 19:16 favoring AMD. You said smokes? It would have to be more like 24-11 to call it smoking, or at least 23-12.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

Reply to Crashman

I enjoyed this <A HREF="http://www.tech-report.com/onearticle.x/5683" target="_new">article</A>. It truly shows that bias can flow either way. The graphs on cache performance were icing on the cake as were various jovial jabs at many shortcomings of the contenders.

Note: I have yet to read any other reviews other than this one and Toms.

Dichromatic for your viewing plesure...

Reply to Schmide
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD 64 Processor
Go to:

There are 1286 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them