How does the Opteron compare with the Athlon64 FX in terms of gaming performance? The Opteron 2.0Ghz is comparable in price to the Athlon64 FX, which is 1.6Ghz, and the Opteron 1.8Ghz is significantly cheaper. I also use PCI-X slots. I'm thinking of getting one of the Tyan dual-Opteron motherboards with AGP and PCI-X and just getting one Opteron CPU (which I know I can do). However, I would like to hear some people's thoughts as to how the Opteron compares with the Athlon64 FX.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
The two are (AFAIK) based on the same core and fit in the same socket (Socket940). Both require registered memory.
I <i>don't</i> know if the Athlon64 FX will actually run in a multiprocessor config though. Also, I don't think Opteron does any memory speed higher than DDR333--and thus, I don't know if any dually Opteron motherboards will handle DDR400.
Just pointing that out, in case you were thinking of trying to build a dually with Athlon64 FX's.
<i>I can love my fellow man...but I'm damned if I'll love yours.</i>
more precisely: athlon FX 51 == Opteron 148 (both 2.2 GHz)
Opteron 148 isnt out though.
Also keep in mind you need an Opteron 2xx for SMP (8xx for >2 way). The FX and 1xx are strictly uniprocessor cpu's.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.