Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Silicon No More - We have found something better

Silicon No More - We have found something better

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Silicon No More - We have found something better

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

<A HREF="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20031105tech.htm" target="_new">http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20031105tech.htm</A>

<Intro snippet>
<b>Intel Researchers Develop Breakthrough Transistor Technologies To Fight Power, Heat Issues In Future Processors</b>
SANTA CLARA, Calif., Nov. 5, 2003 - Intel Corporation today announced it has identified new materials to replace those that have been used to manufacture chips for more than 30 years. The breakthrough is a significant accomplishment as the industry races to reduce electrical current leakage in transistors -- a growing problem for chip manufacturers as more and more transistors are packed onto tiny pieces of silicon.
</Intro snipper>

-Raystonn


= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my employer. =

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Nice post. But it's old news. I read that days ago.

Reply to HardWareBoss

I checked for posts, but did not see any.

-Raystonn


= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my employer. =

Reply to Raystonn

Saw that in NYTimes, so maybe we'll have to delay quantum computers for a bit?

The one and only "Monstrous BULLgarian!"

Reply to Flamethrower205

You where the first to post it.

Reply to HardWareBoss

Completely forget about quantum computers for a decade or two, then we can take a look a the situation again. They currently have huge issues to make them practical and even feasible. They need to be able to control several hundreds of quantum bits, while curently they only have half a dozen. It also has to be super-cooled so it won't fit in your living room. The 'interface' to the quantum bits would still be electrical thus limited by the same problems for sequencial computing. Quantum bit states are volatile (in the order of femtoseconds) and only have a limited certainty of returning the correct result (Heisenberg). Reading out just one quantum state erases the superposition of other states (Schrodinger's Cat) so there is still no way to use it for parallel -independent- computing. And last but not least there is only a handfull of algorithms that theoretically really do take full use of a quantum computer's processing power, like code breaking. So once they have a real one working, the CIA will use it for several years before the public even gets to see a glimpse of it.

On top of that, the silicon business is so huge that it would be impossible for the first slow and expensive quantum computers to get a spot in the market. As long as there is no real demand for it from companies and the big public it simply won't get nowhere. And the silicon industry won't let itself get pushed away. Compare it to electrical cars or the ones on hydrogen: they -could- be cheaper, faster and cleaner than cars on gasoline -if- there was some more money for research but right now everybody is just too happy with gasoline and the money they make out of mother earth's resources...

By the way, the title of this thread is incorrect as well. They still do use silicon as the major component, they just found a better dielectic and gate material. Eventually silicon might also get replaced by 'artificial' semi-conductors but not quite yet.

Reply to c0d1f1ed

Hehe, I know, I work with algorithms for quantum comps:) Dey is huge sexy hunks of machinery.....actually the engineers get to play around with cool stuff, best I get is to use a classical computer to simulate something I derived.


To Mephistopheles (sp?): Dude, I totally forgot about our conversation, I owe you an apology and a continuation!

The one and only "Monstrous BULLgarian!"

Reply to Flamethrower205

well on to the exotics and not so exotics, when I worked for Rockwell the processor chips were made of GaAs (gallium Arsnide)when I left for greener pastures in 1994 we had a processor chip that clocked at 21 ghz, of course it was only 16 bit and .5 micron technology. I wonder how far that process has gone, these chips were for DARPA so who knows where they are today. The process was also used epitaxial layers so the "transistors" were vertical into the P & N doping. Just some food for thought about the "new" materials being used today

when all is said and done, what you've done for your neighbor is most important

Reply to svend

LTNS

Where you been hiding?

Im still poking sticks at the lemmings.

<b>"You haven't proven anything that once 64-bit support comes out, it will perform even better." -EDEN</b>

Reply to FUGGER

Leave the lemmings alone.

Reply to HardWareBoss

Someone say <A HREF="http://www.joecartoon.com/pages/livenletdive/" target="_new">lemmings</A>?

The one and only "Monstrous BULLgarian!"

Reply to Flamethrower205

Where the heck did you find that link?

Reply to HardWareBoss
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Silicon No More - We have found something better
Go to:

There are 650 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them