Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Intel claims it's mastered 65 nano technology

Last response: in CPUs
Share
November 24, 2003 8:37:30 PM

<A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12834" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12834&lt;/A>


----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
November 24, 2003 8:47:59 PM

The heck with them. I read it in Yahoo finances On Intel stock.
November 24, 2003 8:48:53 PM

Sweet 65nm by 05. Tejas looks like time for next upgrade.
Related resources
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
November 24, 2003 9:39:54 PM

On others source say that it just SRAM.In 2001 90nm sram was done and was working very well at high speed.To say there will be a micron process swith in less that 2 year nay.Delay again for 2006 2H

I dont like french test
November 24, 2003 10:28:38 PM

Quote:
On others source say that it just SRAM.In 2001 90nm sram was done and was working very well at high speed.To say there will be a micron process swith in less that 2 year nay.Delay again for 2006 2H


But I think for 90u they had to buy all new equipment for the strained silicon and 300mm wafers etc. But for 65u they will be using the same equipment. That's probably the reason for the faster transition.

KG

"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity." - Sarah Chambers
November 25, 2003 12:58:14 AM

it was a bigger tansition 300 wafer new dielectrique strained sillicon.The transistion according to intel never been doing so well even so it they coming late as 1 cpu on 90 nm was suppost to be in 2003 1H.

I dont like french test
November 25, 2003 1:55:02 AM

Tejas in about a year, cool.
November 25, 2003 2:48:08 AM

Maybe Thats a big MAYBE 2nd half 04.
November 25, 2003 3:24:05 AM

We can hope... that would definetly be real cool.

Shadus
November 25, 2003 4:04:28 AM

90nm SRAM was announced in March 2002, not 2001. It has only been 20 months.
November 25, 2003 11:51:35 AM

Those thing are far in my memory.As you say 20 month that fit in the normal 2 year delay for real working chip.So in theorie 0.065 should be in 2005 Q4

I dont like french test
November 25, 2003 5:46:45 PM

I was waiting for Tejas 2005. But if Intel wants to release it early I'm not complaning.
!