blah

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,694
0
20,780
F32, it is like an F16 but twice as fast (you can think of it as Mig of the gamer's file system).

..this is very useful and helpful place for information...
 

lagger

Distinguished
Jan 19, 2001
1,922
0
19,780
NTFS adds a better layer of protection on xp boxes with multiple user accounts

<font color=red><b> <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hills/9267/fuddef.html" target="_new">FUD</A></font color=red></b>
 

ejsmith2

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2001
3,228
0
20,780
Neither.

Ext3 with journaling is the best.



Everything else is a poor substitute.

Like saccharin instead of sugar. Or skydiving instead of sex...

P4's @ 3600Mhz ()wNz J00 4LL!!!!!!
 

Bardic

Distinguished
Aug 7, 2001
274
0
18,780
If you are the only person on the machine, or you don't have any files to hide from the other people on the machine, I prefer FAT32. AT least that way it is easier to boot with a dos disk and still access things.

And if Joe downloads something on his desktop, and you want to get to it from your logon, you can't do it with NTFS, just gets in the way.
 

blah

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,694
0
20,780
(just in case you've missed the boat;)

the question was about the best performance, not the "better layer of protection"

..this is very useful and helpful place for information...
 

blah

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,694
0
20,780
Office apps and games will run "jelly" slow on Ext3 (and that is in case if you could possibly get them to run at all on such system).

..this is very useful and helpful place for information...
 

newbie

Distinguished
Mar 14, 2001
421
0
18,780
Oops, didn't finish reading the whole sentense... go with FAT32 if you're only playing games

<A HREF="http://evilcity.com/" target="_new">The city of evilness...</A>