Archived from groups: comp.sys.hp.hardware (More info?)
We have a StorageWorks 4354 connected to an MSA 1000 to work as our mini-SAN
for one of our environments. We've found ourselves to be storage bound
rather than IO bound and have considered picking up single port I/O modules
to replace our dual port modules.
What I wanted to know is, what else would we be giving up if we were to do
this? I've read about "controller duplexing" with the dual port cards, but I
haven't found any information on what that is besides the fact that it's
part of a fault tolerant setup.
I think I know what I'd gain from moving to a single port module, but it
doesn't seem like anyone does this. What would I lose? What exactly is
controller duplexing?
Michael
We have a StorageWorks 4354 connected to an MSA 1000 to work as our mini-SAN
for one of our environments. We've found ourselves to be storage bound
rather than IO bound and have considered picking up single port I/O modules
to replace our dual port modules.
What I wanted to know is, what else would we be giving up if we were to do
this? I've read about "controller duplexing" with the dual port cards, but I
haven't found any information on what that is besides the fact that it's
part of a fault tolerant setup.
I think I know what I'd gain from moving to a single port module, but it
doesn't seem like anyone does this. What would I lose? What exactly is
controller duplexing?
Michael