For those thinking that DDR-2's extra latencies will matter, this is a great question: Why would it matter? THG showed that, with current chipsets, timings of 2-2-2-5 will yield performance differences that are minimal when compared to timings of 3-4-4-8. So going DDR2-533 should do only good, as far as we can tell now.
Unfortunately, it'll probably cost about twice the price of current DDR-1. But DDR, when first introduced, also costed twice the price of regular SDRAM... Prices will go down as more manufaturers compete and establish DDR2.
Wouldn't this mean that AMD's official statement was a little bogus?... Latencies won't hurt DDR2 that much... Problem for them, of course, is that they'd have to - guess what - probably change sockets again. Because of the on-die memory controller.
<font color=red><b>M</b></font color=red>ephistopheles
Unfortunately, it'll probably cost about twice the price of current DDR-1. But DDR, when first introduced, also costed twice the price of regular SDRAM... Prices will go down as more manufaturers compete and establish DDR2.
Wouldn't this mean that AMD's official statement was a little bogus?... Latencies won't hurt DDR2 that much... Problem for them, of course, is that they'd have to - guess what - probably change sockets again. Because of the on-die memory controller.
<font color=red><b>M</b></font color=red>ephistopheles