Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > The WinRAR benchmark
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
addiarmadar   01-29-2004 at 03:49:31 PM

I know that there was a post for this somewhere here but I cannot find it. I tried the benchmark and Scored 350kbs. What have you all gotten with your rigs? Need a base of comparison. Thanks...

Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Spitfire_x86   01-29-2004 at 03:52:02 PM
- 0 +

<b><A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/spitfire_x86/thgc/rarbench.html" target="_new">Here's THGC WinRAR benchmark chart</A></b>. Currently <b>gothitbycar</b> is leading the chart with 503 kb/s (Athlon64 3200+)

Your score isn't added yet. I will update chart daily.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
addiarmadar   01-29-2004 at 04:02:25 PM
- 0 +

64bit platforms definately has the advantage since they can do double of wat 32bit platforms can. Since I see that I smoked a legit Athlon XP 3200 then my score rocks for my abused 2500.

Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)

Reply to addiarmadar
Zoron   01-29-2004 at 04:58:33 PM
- 0 +

Quote :

64bit platforms definately has the advantage since they can do double of wat 32bit platforms can.



Ummm... no.

The OS and application have to support 64-Bit before it will have ANY effect on performance.

<font color=red> If you design software that is fool-proof, only a fool will want to use it. </font color=red>

Reply to Zoron
Spitfire_x86   01-29-2004 at 05:12:34 PM
- 0 +

Memory latency plays a big role in this benchmark. When I used 2.5-3-3-6 instead of 2.0-2-2-5, I got 7.14% lower score.

Athlon64/Opterons are performing great because of their on-die memory controller. This is purely 32 bit application and I think 64 bit will give some performance boost in this kind of apps.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
tombance   01-29-2004 at 10:28:45 PM
- 0 +

229Kbps, but I may get that a bit higher by dropping my memory latencies (they will work lower in everything apart from CoD, very annoying):

1700+ at 2600+ (166x12.5)
MSI 745 Ultra
512MB PC2700 2.5-3-3-6
Geforce 4 Ti4200
WD 80GB SE

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7454540" target="_new">Yay, I Finally broke the 12k barrier!!</A>

Reply to tombance
cdpage   01-29-2004 at 10:36:34 PM
- 0 +

you might as well put me down on there for 207 aswell

not sure what it is that is slowing things down here.

<b>on the verge of catastrophy (y1.999...k)</b>
ASUS P4S8X - P4 2.4B - 2 x 512M DDR333 - ATI 9500 Pro - WD 80G HD(8M) - SAMSUNG SV0844D 8G HD - LG 16X DVD - Yamaha F1 CDRW

Reply to cdpage
tombance   01-29-2004 at 10:42:54 PM
- 0 +

Ok, just rebooted at 2.5-2-2-5 and got 248Kbps. I think your right Spitfire, memory latency does make a big difference. I think the memory controller does too, since it seems my SiS745 and 2600+ isnt as fast as a lot of the nforce2's with much slower processors. Also if the P3's are on BX platforms theyre likely to score quite high due to the very efficient chipset design.

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7454540" target="_new">Yay, I Finally broke the 12k barrier!!</A>

Reply to tombance
Boilermaker   01-29-2004 at 10:45:05 PM
- 0 +

277

P4 2.4B, Abit be7-R
1GB PC2700 2-2-2-5
Geforce 4 Ti4200
WD 20 GB, 2WD 120 GB

Reply to Boilermaker
cdpage   01-29-2004 at 11:25:24 PM
- 0 +

you see that ain right!

I have the same system as boilermaker there...

how do i find out my latency on my ram? btw my chipset is sis648 socket 478

<b>on the verge of catastrophy (y1.999...k)</b>
ASUS P4S8X - P4 2.4B - 2 x 512M DDR333 - ATI 9500 Pro - WD 80G HD(8M) - SAMSUNG SV0844D 8G HD - LG 16X DVD - Yamaha F1 CDRW

Reply to cdpage
Boilermaker   01-29-2004 at 11:45:24 PM
- 0 +

how many programs did you have running in the background? i ran the benchmark after a reboot, and turned off my antivirus program.

Reply to Boilermaker
gothitbycar   01-30-2004 at 12:09:44 AM
- 0 +

That's right i have the highest score. I'm so happy still. No one better beat that.

-----------------------
[mind went blank]

Reply to gothitbycar
taitertot   01-30-2004 at 12:11:30 AM
- 0 +

Screen shot to prove it Mr. AMD pants :tongue: .

-taitertot

If this post has attitude, seems to be overly aggressive, rude, distasteful to 99% of the users here, and shows a zealous defense of Intel... It’s probably Spud.

Reply to taitertot
gothitbycar   01-30-2004 at 12:27:59 AM
- 0 +

Coming right up

-----------------------
[mind went blank]

Reply to gothitbycar
gothitbycar   01-30-2004 at 12:41:44 AM
- 0 +

<A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~gothitbycar/benchmarkresults.html" target="_new"> Here it is </A>

-----------------------
[mind went blank]

Reply to gothitbycar
taitertot   01-30-2004 at 12:45:18 AM
- 0 +

I do not beleive CPU-Z to ID your chip :tongue: .

-taitertot

If this post has attitude, seems to be overly aggressive, rude, distasteful to 99% of the users here, and shows a zealous defense of Intel... It’s probably Spud.

Reply to taitertot
gothitbycar   01-30-2004 at 12:50:15 AM
- 0 +

What more do you want out of me, ive been harping about this system for quite a while now.

-----------------------
[mind went blank]

Reply to gothitbycar
gothitbycar   01-30-2004 at 01:00:06 AM
- 0 +

I did some math for you taitertot

Jim552's Operton 242 gets 412 points @ 1.6ghz this means:
every 3.88mhz = 1 point
My A64 3200+ gets 503 points @ 2ghz, therefore:
3.97mhz = 1 point

That pretty much shows perfect scaling.

-----------------------
[mind went blank]

Reply to gothitbycar
Spitfire_x86   01-30-2004 at 01:19:40 AM
- 0 +

Jim's Opteron surely has ECC memory, which is hurting scores little. And he hasn't told that he was running DDR400, his socre may be with DDR333, since ECC DDR400 is very expensive

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
Spitfire_x86   01-30-2004 at 01:39:32 AM
- 0 +

maybe your sis648 isn't that good, or you may tighten up memory timing?

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
kevbo   01-30-2004 at 01:50:33 AM
- 0 +

I got 290,

2500+, not overclocked
1 Gig ram
80 GB WD with 8MB cache

Reply to kevbo
Spitfire_x86   01-30-2004 at 02:00:49 AM
- 0 +

it would be good if you let us know your memory timing

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
kevbo   01-30-2004 at 05:47:55 AM
- 0 +

it's CAS 2. I forget what the rest is, I *think* it's 2-3-3-7 or something along those lines. I had it at 2-2-2-5 for awhile, but went back to default.

Reply to kevbo
coylter   01-30-2004 at 07:18:31 PM
- 0 +

There should be a chart of all benchmark.
Hoh and if you want to adjust the chart i now get 324 with my memory at 3-3-3-2

My own beast: Athlon 2700xp+ (oc: 3200xp+ with 200fsb) , Radeon 9800pro (oc: 410/370) , 512mb ddr400. SO MUCH faster than my last computer (pIII 550......)<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by coylter on 01/30/04 01:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to coylter
Rick_Criswell   01-30-2004 at 10:09:47 PM
- 0 +

431
P4p800
P4 2.6@ 3.41 262fsb
2x 256MB CorsairXMS 3500 5/4(209mhz) 2/2/2/5/8
WD 400jb


I aint signing nothing!!!

Reply to Rick_Criswell
Spitfire_x86   01-30-2004 at 11:49:34 PM
- 0 +

Is your memory running at 2.0-3-3-3 or 3.0-3-3-2?

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
Spitfire_x86   01-31-2004 at 12:00:47 AM
- 0 +

Guys, I remind you one thing. Use overclocking settings that you use regularly. Unstable system used for benchmarking is some kind of cheating. Don't report score with a PC that crash within few miniutes after completing benchmark.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>

Reply to Spitfire_x86
cdpage   01-31-2004 at 03:01:44 AM
- 0 +

how do i go about tightening up my Memory timimg?

<b>on the verge of catastrophy (y1.999...k)</b>
ASUS P4S8X - P4 2.4B - 2 x 512M DDR333 - ATI 9500 Pro - WD 80G HD(8M) - SAMSUNG SV0844D 8G HD - LG 16X DVD - Yamaha F1 CDRW

Reply to cdpage
Rick_Criswell   01-31-2004 at 03:46:35 AM
- 0 +

These are my EVERY-DAY running specs. If I wanted to crank it up for scores I would post it at 3.53gig. Which will complete all benchmarks. But fails in prime 95 whev voltages drop below 1.6v. It's an Asus problem.

I aint signing nothing!!!

Reply to Rick_Criswell
Ned_Flanders   01-31-2004 at 01:57:12 PM
- 0 +

I get 350kb/s....with my PC
AXP 2500@3200
1 GB DDR 400 (PC3200) RAM (in dual channel mode)
and other assorted components

I am a small fat ginger kid and I lob cow pats at old people, please be my friend

Reply to Ned_Flanders
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > The WinRAR benchmark
Go to:

There are 969 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.313 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?