Performance chart of Thg Users

It would be interesting and very usefull to have a chart of benchmark of all the people here in thg.

Benchmark like:
3dmark03
3dmark01
Aquamark
WinRar
PcMark
...

With the system info of everyone:
-Cpu (Speed an type)
-Motherboard
-Ram (Speed an type)
-Video Card (Speed an type)
-SoundCard??
-Hard Disk

It would be usefull because a lot of people come in the forums and say things like : Is my xxxx benchmark score Ok?.
With a chart they could go compare with other...

Anyone interested?

My own beast: Athlon 2700xp+ (oc: 3200xp+ with 200fsb) , Radeon 9800pro (oc: 410/370) , 512mb ddr400. SO MUCH faster than my last computer (pIII 550......)<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by coylter on 01/30/04 01:32 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
13 answers Last reply
More about performance chart users
  1. Alright, I'm starting to get peeved too. I second the notion.

    Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
  2. i just need a way to do it....

    My own beast: Athlon 2700xp+ (oc: 3200xp+ with 200fsb) , Radeon 9800pro (oc: 410/370) , 512mb ddr400. SO MUCH faster than my last computer (pIII 550......)
  3. Well, I'm bored at the moment so I suppose I'll go and get the programs at least. May never use them... :smile:
  4. its probably a good idea but....with all the possible combinations of cpus, motherboards, chipsets, ram,etc...do you really think that even if a newbie takes the time to look for or look at a benchmark chart, he/she will still not post the same old questions because their rig doesnt match one of ours exactly?

    that being said, if a chart is going to be developed i'd contribute. maybe someone can layout which benchmarks will be used and then post links to them, to speed up the process.
  5. I've thought about 3DMark and Aquamark charts. But I think there's too much chance of cheating in 3D benchmarks. We can only hope that people won't do things like decreasing mip-map detail level, benchmark in lower resolution/lower color depth, cheaptimized driver to get edge over other score. The thought of cheating is holding me back.

    And I think PCMark is useless. Same thing applies for Sandra/Sysmark/Winstone. Think about something else. I think divx/xvid/lame mp3/ogg vorbis encoding test would be a good idea, but test result can vary depending on test file used.

    ----------------
    <b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

    <b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
  6. Although I am sceptical that is will lower the "is my score low" newbie posts, it sounds like a good idea.

    ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 512MB Corsair TwinX PC3200LL, Radeon 9500 Pro, Santa Cruz, Antec 1000AMG, TruePower 430watt
  7. That would be a crazy chart, I think to much information would be on it, it would be hard to sort out.

    You should make a top performer chart having the fastest performing PIII, fastest performing P4, athlon, athlon xp, 64, fx, etc. People will feel better that way as long as they know they have a chance to get the highest marks in their category.

    -----------------------
    [mind went blank]
  8. Doing it for 3Dmark seems utterly irrelevant to me.. after all, madonion already has such a database, and its far more powerfull, big and "cheat free" as anyone could every hope to accomplish on his own.

    = The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
  9. but you have to register at futuremark forum. many people may be too lazy for registering (including me).

    btw, it's cheat free only when it comes to resolution. how does it prevent other cheats?

    ----------------
    <b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

    <b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
  10. This info is online at furturemark. This is pointless.

    <font color=red>_________________________________________</font color=red>
    <b><A HREF="http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?dhlucke" target="_new">Jessica Simpson Naked!!!</A></b>
  11. I hear you, i think that performance test is useless as well. I kept "cheating" if you will. I now am getting 460 mark scores. People like to call it tweaking, i agree though... it's cheating.

    <A HREF="http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=610166081" target="_new">http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=610166081</A>
    Figured i'd do it too..reality my ass.
  12. i could do th chart by i do not know how to do it (i could post it directly in the forums but there only so little place to type your message that i would get lost)

    Athlon 2700xp+ (oc: 3200xp+ with 200fsb) , Radeon 9800pro (oc: 410/370) , 512mb pc3200 (3-3-3-2), Asus A7N8X-X<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by coylter on 01/31/04 11:56 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
  13. I have always believe your scores Spitz I know what my system is supposed to score and it does exactly what it should set to the very minor clock speed adjustments I have done to it.

    I also hate cheaters and hackers I have been online for so long in multy player games that unless we play with he same guy for 2 or 3 years we seldom believe everything they do is without hacking or cheating.

    Barton 3200+ 400MHz
    A7N8X Deluxe
    Liquid 12 Celsius
    2x512 Crucial DDR 400 PC3200
    GeForce FX5900
    Two Maxtor 40Gig 8MB cach 7200rpm
    SONY RW 52x/24x/52x
    SONY DVD 16x/40x
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Performance Benchmark