>Prescott is not a bad perfromer and have pretty good
>price/performance ratio compared to Northwood "C"
Its prices are identical to NW, and it performs pretty much identical as well. so, no its not a bad p/p deal, but why the hell get a 70°C cpu if the same money buys you a otherwise functionally identical <<50°C cpu (P4C) ? As 3.6 and faster prescotts come out, there might be a reason to pick them up, but at current speeds, it makes no sense whatsoever compared to identically clocked, priced and performing northwoods IMHO.
> I know about the 2 GB + 2 GB = 4 GB thing. I've said 4 GB
>addressing keeping this fact in mind
You know, but the average reader does most certainly not know this. And your text is not helpfull in making him realize this either, quite on the contrary.
>The people who are affected by current memory addressing
>limitation are photoshop professional, 3d modeler etc. They
>will need not only hardware, but also 64 bit windows and
>app
No. A 32 bit app will be able to adress the full 4 Gigs when running under a 64 bit OS. The OS maps the kernel space to high memory regions, unaccessible to 32 bit protected mode apps, and can free up pretty much the entire low 4 GB for the app. There is definately a benefit running 32 bit apps under a 64 bit OS.
>And I think photoshop and other similar pro-level software
>will not come immediately (since I haven't read any such
>announcement).
Neither have I, but since Photoshop is already tweaked on the Apple G5 to take advantage of the 64 bit cpu (even though the OS is still basically 32 bit !), I would be surprised if it took long for a AMD64 Photoshop release.
> So it's actually going to be early 2006 when people who
>need too much memory will benefit from extra memory
>addressing capability of x86-64 CPUs.
No, like I explained above. upon release of 64 bit windows, they can benefit.
>And 90% other users (gamers for example), will have no
>problem with 2 GB + 2 GB addressing limitaiton for at least
>2 years.
Sure, they will manage with 2 GB address space, just like they will manage with only a gig of ram, and a 3 GHz orless cpu and a DX8.1 videocard. Does that mean no one benefits from >3 GHz, DX9/9.1c or several gigs of ram ?
Also consider this: windows maps the video memory in the upper 2 GB range. Twice !. That means, a 256 Mb card (pretty common place today) eats up half a gig of address space. Imagine 512 Mb cards (new upcoming Radeons and Geforces are supposed to support and implement this). 1 Gig down the drain. Now imagine someone wanting to use PCI-Express capabilities of using 2 such videocards ! Impossible on a 32 bit OS & CPU. Granted, not possible with current A64 boards either, but still something to consider if you think its gonna take 2 more years before anyone benefits.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =