Lynn Hammond - Seller of Shadow / STTNG / TOM / LOTR / TZ

[Bart]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

Hey guys !

In case the other post did not get your attention - Here's the deal: My
soon to be ex-wife is going AGAINST a court order (I'll fax docs if you
bought these machines unaware that they were going against a court order) -
she's trying to get these machines sold that I have put so much hard work
and effort restoring. They are my personal property and per the court
order, NOT TO BE SOLD.

I would like anyone with information OR the buyers of these machines to come
forward. I have serial numbers, etc. pictures, and engravings on the
machines to identify them. I will be in court with her in a few days with
regards to these, so it would be best if I can just buy them back from you
before court proceedings demand their return.

email me at b*hammond@hammond*mortgage.com (remove asterisks) - or call me
at (770) 886-6460. Thanks for your prompt attention and help before I have
to go another step.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

That would make them stolen property then, right? You might want to
hope that she does not damage them.....

 

[Bart]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

Yes, I have that hope that she does not damage them, but again, that's in
violation of the COURT order.

<seymour-shabow@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1123773309.371462.54800@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> That would make them stolen property then, right? You might want to
> hope that she does not damage them.....
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

In divorce wars one should gather all the proof one can, especially when it
specifically violates a court order because a good lawyer will turn that
into good ammunition to launch or block future offensives.

GRY

"Bart" <bhammond@hammondmortgage.com> wrote in message
news:u0KKe.1737$xW.1614@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> Yes, I have that hope that she does not damage them, but again, that's in
> violation of the COURT order.
>
> <seymour-shabow@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:1123773309.371462.54800@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> That would make them stolen property then, right? You might want to
>> hope that she does not damage them.....
>>
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

WOW, glad I didn't buy one of those. I called about them and she said
she was going to send out pictures to everyone who inquired. I never
received any pictures, I guess that's a good thing!
Hope you get all of this straightened out.

Dan

 

[Bart]

Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (More info?)

Thanks Gary - and to everyone AGAIN - for all your help - I STILL HAVE NOT
found the people who bought them, yet. I do want them returned (I'll buy
them back, of course) - Because they're in Super mint condition with nothing
wrong - I put over 80 hours of time into each machine to make them look very
nice, and I hate for my PASSION for pinball to be turned into such an awful
memory (with the loss of all my machines).


"Ceegary" <ceegary@cox.net> wrote in message
news:5cPKe.1606$Ji4.352@fed1read03...
> In divorce wars one should gather all the proof one can, especially when
> it specifically violates a court order because a good lawyer will turn
> that into good ammunition to launch or block future offensives.
>
> GRY
>
> "Bart" <bhammond@hammondmortgage.com> wrote in message
> news:u0KKe.1737$xW.1614@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> Yes, I have that hope that she does not damage them, but again, that's in
>> violation of the COURT order.
>>
>> <seymour-shabow@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:1123773309.371462.54800@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>> That would make them stolen property then, right? You might want to
>>> hope that she does not damage them.....
>>>
>>
>>
>
>