But the Duron cost less than the Celeron and gives you the nForce chipset option, for halfway decent onboard graphics, saving even more money.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
they could be great overclockers, but even overclocked beyond common sense, they are still incredible poor performers. 128 Kb cache kills its performance no matter how high clockfrequencies or FSB speeds you reach. Have a look <A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927" target="_new"> here </A> Even if you could overclock it to 4 GHz, you would have a hard time finding a few benchmarks where it beats a stock 1.6 Duron, XP1700+ or an old 1.8 GHz P4A. Overclocking todays celerons is like trying to turbocharge a bicycle.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.