>R&D is in the billions, Intel is has 900 million dollars
>available this year for grants to be given away. Up a
>little from last year.
That is total R&D, my $500M estimate was limited to Itanium specific R&D. What exactly are you claiming ?
>I2 has its place with military and goverment sales alone
>and projects already in place ensure its sucess, not the
>consumer sales. But those sales are nice and do help.
Do the math, and tell me its a financial succes. Its a financial disaster so far, and if they don't manage to sell millions per year instead of the 100k they sold last year, it will continue to be a red ink bleeding project.
>But it is a easy angle for you to rag on, that is because
>you are clueless like most of the other folks around here
>so who is to doubt you? fricken midget mentalities all
>worried about what Intel spends on what...
I don't "worry" about it, intel has deep pockets, no one is arguing that. But if you consider 100k units a success, you should put that in perspective. Its a modest commercial success, but it is not nearly enough to break even on the collosal investments intel has poured into this. Nor do I think intel ever will break even on Itanium now that EM64T will make it hard, if not impossible to grow Itaniums market substantially. The ammount of money intel invested in IPF only makes sense if they expected it to go mainstream at some point in the future, it doesnt make sense if you are only going to sell cpu's (not systems , software and services like HP/IBM/SGI,..) in the big tin and big iron markets. There is just not the required volume to make money on CPU's only.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =