<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/#21776" target="_new">AnandTech offer a list of FX-53 reviews</A>
I just finished read a couple of them, and I don't understand how ExtremeTech got those results : <A HREF="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1550760,00.asp" target="_new">Weird results at ExtremeTech</A>.
In many benchmarks the Athlon 64 3400+ outperforms the FX-53. I can't believe it! I checked their systems setup and the only major difference between the A64 3400+ system and the A-FX system is the chipset. I thought it might be the memory timing, but it's not... The 3400+ is configured to CL 2.5 and the FX to CL 2.0.
Any idea? Something is "wrong" with these results.
By the way, if you find any other weird stuff or anything to mention about other FX-53 reviews, tell me! I would like to know.
--
Would you buy a GPS enabled soap bar?
I just finished read a couple of them, and I don't understand how ExtremeTech got those results : <A HREF="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1550760,00.asp" target="_new">Weird results at ExtremeTech</A>.
In many benchmarks the Athlon 64 3400+ outperforms the FX-53. I can't believe it! I checked their systems setup and the only major difference between the A64 3400+ system and the A-FX system is the chipset. I thought it might be the memory timing, but it's not... The 3400+ is configured to CL 2.5 and the FX to CL 2.0.
Any idea? Something is "wrong" with these results.
By the way, if you find any other weird stuff or anything to mention about other FX-53 reviews, tell me! I would like to know.
--
Would you buy a GPS enabled soap bar?