Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > dual althlon vs. dual xeon vs. dual opteron

dual althlon vs. dual xeon vs. dual opteron

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - dual althlon vs. dual xeon vs. dual opteron

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

dual Althon MP vs. dual Opteron vs. dual Xeon vs Athlon 64FX

looking to build a high end workstating for computer animation. I'm wondering what setup is going to give me the most bang for my buck. i don't plan on buying another system for awhile, so is it worth going with a 64 bit processor or are they not up to snuff yet? Again primary use will be 3D apps. like softimage, and if half-life 2 plays well on it then that doesn't hurt too.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

dual Xeon would best for server duty so i'd stay away from that, best at gaming and 3d apps would probly be the athlon64

P4 2.8c
Seagate 160g 7200rpm 8mb cache
2x256 Crucial PC3200
Radeon 9800pro 128
Asus P4P800

Reply to miniklobb

Rendering typically favors Xeons over opteron/A64/FX. It depends on the app though, I can't say for sure about softimage. Try google, see if you can find any benchmarks.

As for the "64 bitness", it sure won't hurt, but I'm not entirely sure it will make a big difference for rendering unless you'd work with *extremely* complex scenes. Once 64 bit windows hits the shelves and rendering engines get optimized for it, opteron/A64/FX might get a decent performance boost because of the doubled number of SSE2 registers. Wether or when this will apply to your apps, is anyone's guess.

I short, flip a coin, I think both xeon and opteron would be a good choice, I would avoid the the MP's unless you're on a really tight budget, and the A64 FX doesnt make much sense either, since rendering typically scales rather well with SMP, so you'd get more bang/buck with a dual cpu setup than a super fast single cpu setup.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =

Reply to P4Man

Rendering typically favors Xeons over opteron/A64/FX. It depends on the app though, I can't say for sure about softimage. Try google, see if you can find any benchmarks.

As for the "64 bitness", it sure won't hurt, but I'm not entirely sure it will make a big difference for rendering unless you'd work with *extremely* complex scenes. Once 64 bit windows hits the shelves and rendering engines get optimized for it, opteron/A64/FX might get a decent performance boost because of the doubled number of SSE2 registers. Wether or when this will apply to your apps, is anyone's guess.

I short, flip a coin, I think both xeon and opteron would be a good choice, I would avoid the the MP's unless you're on a really tight budget, and the A64 FX doesnt make much sense either, since rendering typically scales rather well with SMP, so you'd get more bang/buck with a dual cpu setup than a super fast single cpu setup.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =

Reply to P4Man

As P4man mentioned, rendering tends to favour Xeons. Dual Xeons on an Asus PC-DL or Iwill DH800 (DH800 if you need PCI-X) would be my vote.

If you need more then 4gb of memory that would mean Opterons.

*Dual PIII-800 @900 i440BX and Tualeron 1.2 @1.7 i815*

Reply to JCLW
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > dual althlon vs. dual xeon vs. dual opteron
Go to:

There are 1229 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them