New presccott celeron way faster

[juin]

http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articleswindow.php?id=101

Much faster that NW celeron it 50% faster in some case.

i need to change useur name.

 

[P4Man]

Performance indeed looks reasonable if still not stellar for a budget cpu. It would still have a hard time beating a XP1800+ and would be chanceless against a XP2500+ costing less. Too bad they didnt include comparable XP's or Durons.

Also, Celeron was terrible as it was, but its performance plumetted even further when using integrated graphics (which would be a typical Celeron config). I'd be interested seeing some benchmarking of Celeron + IGP versus P4/AXP/Duron+IGP.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =

 

[TheRod]

I can't remember the link, but I saw somewhere a review of these new Celeron with comparison to Athlon XP. Intel is on his way to finally give people a decent low cost CPU.

--
Lookin' to fill that <font color=blue>GOD</font color=blue> shape hole!

 

[Schmide]

<A HREF="http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articleswindow.php?id=101" target="_new">http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articleswindow.php?id=101</A>

Dichromatic for your viewing plesure...

 

[Spitfire_x86]

Who cares? It's performs like the ghost of Willamette P4.

AXPs will have no problem outperforming it

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>

 

[pat]

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927" target="_new"> This link?</A>

-Always put the blame on you first, then on the hardware !!!

 

[TheRod]

No, not this link, it's not the NEW Celeron.

--
Lookin' to fill that <font color=blue>GOD</font color=blue> shape hole!