I'm wondering why the review by Harald Thon didn't include any benchmarks with the newest Pentium 4-M (3.4GHz)? Wouldn't it make sense to use the 'best of breeds' from all product categories and vendors?
On a business side, I've got foolish users who only see a 3.4 being larger than a 1.7 (and now 2.0). Now while this is true in a mathmatical sense, we all know this isn't true on a technology 'side'.
So to cut the bull and get to the real 'meat'-
Has anyone done any benchmarks between the new Dothan 2.0Ghz and a Pent4-M 3.4Ghz?
Please don't tell me why 'thoughts' on what should be; I'd like to see hard numbers. If no one responds before I get my eval units, I'll post up the scores here.
Thanks,
G
On a business side, I've got foolish users who only see a 3.4 being larger than a 1.7 (and now 2.0). Now while this is true in a mathmatical sense, we all know this isn't true on a technology 'side'.
So to cut the bull and get to the real 'meat'-
Has anyone done any benchmarks between the new Dothan 2.0Ghz and a Pent4-M 3.4Ghz?
Please don't tell me why 'thoughts' on what should be; I'd like to see hard numbers. If no one responds before I get my eval units, I'll post up the scores here.
Thanks,
G
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram