<A HREF="http://news.com.com/2100-1024_3-5215599.html" target="_new">Clickomatic for the people</A>
Thanks for the link.
I can't believe they're actually going to offer 1 Terabyte for free. This has got to be either a cock-up somewhere or they're simply gambling that no-one is actually going to use it, which makes it a marketing excercise. Although I notice that google declined to comment, according to that article.
It's ***just*** 1GB, not 1TB. But they better have a lot of TB of server space, 'cause many people will join!!!
<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
That doesn't even make sense! Noone needs that much space at all......... It's like saying, 'here's your 100TB HDD' - heck, I don't need that much space!'
<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
Hey, if someone's going to give me a 100TB HDD, I'll happily have it .
That said though, after careful consideration, I belive the 1Tb limit is <b><font color=blue>N</font color=blue><font color=red>U</font color=red><font color=green>T</font color=green><font color=yellow>S</font color=yellow>!</b>
Ummm, they might as well give me a HDD with a few gigabytes per second of read/write speed (like memory), never mind 100TB. Access speed is still much more interesting than capacity!...
Or just imagine caching the whole OS in memory! 2GB of address space for the whole OS, reading any OS data in like 5GB/s... 100 times faster than HDDs!
<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
Question: when will google make this service available?
When will beta testing end?
When will they go official?
<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
Your saying most poeple will not need that much. But look at as a company needs it. Let say a computer comany or a company like walmart. Where they have tons of email.
Only thing I can think of who would need that much.
>Oh no!
>I checked!
>Some accounts have 1TB limit!
Check again
Quote :
"It was a bug. We are working to fix it," said Google spokesman Nate Tyler. "Gmail offers users 1 gigabyte of storage."
Anyway, with my current ISP I'm limited to 20 GB traffic per month, only 15% (3 GB) of which is upload, so it would take me almost exactly a year just fill up 1 TB Provided I had enough data in he first place. 100 GB would be nice though, to store my collection of XviD DVD rips
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
They should just follow their name and give us a googlebyte.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
but keep on doing that for a google amount of times.
That's one big a$$ number... but to hell with that if i'm leaveing yahoo mail I want a google-plex worth of terabyte's. Now that would be some kick a$$ storage space.
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.