Now, are these all just the exact same CPU with different default settings? If that's the case, I guess going for the cheapest one is the right move. On the other hand, can you expect to get a much better overclock with the 2600+?
Most people buy Mobile Athlon XP 2500+/2600+. You should get one of these, they will easily reach 2.4GHz and if you are lucky you will will push one of these to 2.6GHz.
And for the price differance, many will say, get the 2600+. It's not much more and will guarranty you the best Barton core on the market.
--
What's the <b><font color=green>AMD Mobile Athlon 64</font color=green></b> overclocking potential? <b>It's huge!</b> Humm... Maybe not that huge...
Either the mobile 2500 or 2600 will work and could do 2.4ghz fine. Anything higher will require serious voltage increases and/or cooling.
Mobile Barton 2500+ @ 2420mhz 11x220 1.7v
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro to XT(420/730)
IMO between 45 Watt Mobile there shouldn't be too much difference. The question is the 35W Mobile.
The 35W version is running at lower voltage, albeit at lower frecuency. I'm thinking if it's simply the same CPU but cloked lower so it can run at lower voltage ... anyway that *could* bring another plus to overclock and be a better option that regular Mobile XP (45W)
Hope this helps!
Still looking for a <b>good online retailer</b> in Spain
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.