Amd 64's

[amdark]

im wondering does anyone know where i can find a good benchmark chart showing the 3000+ and the 3200+ both newcastle and clawhammer, cuz i can save like 70 bucks if i go 3000+ and i dont know which core is better the newcastle or the clawhammer. im building a comp for my first time any info would be great.
if u know of a good heatsink and fan combo for the 64's i would like to know that aswell cuz i might take a stab at over clocking.
thanks

 

[scottchen]

If you're into overclocking, then 3200+ is the way to go, it'll overclock much higher than the 3000+.

LOL benchmarks? Toms? lol there are soo much reviews that includes both the 3200+ and 3000+. The stockcooling is good enough for moderate overclocking.

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celebgay.html" target="_new">click here now!!</A>

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/epilepsyr.shtml" target="_new">DON'T CLICK HERE!!</A>

 

[amdark]

ok thanks just making sure better safe then sry in the long run

 

[Zeekfu]

you seen any comparing 3200+ newcastle to 3200+ clawhammer, scott?

<font color=purple>If your nose runs and your feet smell, then maybe you're upside down. W.C. Fields <font color=purple>