Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (
More info?)
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:22:00 -0500, Jeffrey Kaplan wrote:
>> i always wondered why long range ir wasnt the norm on pdas
>> rather than the exception.
>
> Because a strong IR send is a battery drain when you don't need it.
That could be accommodated by having High, Normal and Low IR power
settings in prefs. Even better, a smart protocol that starts at
high power and within a few seconds trains down to the lowest power
that allows error free IR communication.
>> a multifunction universal ir remote should be a standard
>> pda feature, imho.
>
> Why? Controlling stuff like that is a toy feature.
I wouldn't call it a toy feature, but neither do I think it should
be a standard pda feature, as I think it would siphon too many sales
from commercial or shareware IR remote apps. to make their
development practical, leaving everyone with a free IR program, but
one that would probably be pretty primitive. I can't get by with a
single 8 device programmable remote. An IR program for the PDA that
could replace dozens of them (with all configurations hotsync'ed to
a safe storage location) would be nice to have. Since this type of
program wouldn't have any two-way communication, this would be an
exception, where having 3 power settings in prefs would be
preferable to relying only on a 'smart' IR protocol to control tx
power.