90nm A64 news and benchmarks!!

Dude it's some dude that looks like he punk'd you.

Xeon

<font color=orange>Scratch Here To Reveal Prize</font color=orange>
<font color=white>In the case of over scratching contact THG for property damage claims.</font color=white>

MTV... it's been raining lots where I live so I have had lots of time to watch the "TV".

Xeon

<font color=orange>Scratch Here To Reveal Prize</font color=orange>
<font color=white>In the case of over scratching contact THG for property damage claims.</font color=white>

Impressive performance nonetheless...there's rumor of it only dissipating 50ish watts of heat too. Anyway, it looks like this might offer more performance that initially expected, unlike with Prescott.

Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.

GO AMD!!!

<font color=blue>My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.</font color=blue>

whats IPC? (I know / think it has something to do with effiency)

And i hope that they don't and it is only that...a rumor.

AMD deserve a bigger market share, becuase in general they produce the better CPU (just my opinion)

<font color=blue>My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.</font color=blue>

why would you want that? then we would have TWO processors that suck



you probably just wanna see Intel do well.. face it, they arent right now

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
<A HREF="http://www.subhi.com/keyboard.jpg" target="_new">This is you, interweb junky</A>

actually it would be better if only one side had problems in one area or another. the reason being that if thats so, that puts more rpessure on that ocmapny to solve the problem and advance ahead of its competitor, which drives inovation. The more pressure the ebtter. if boht sides have the same problems, yes it will still be pressure to suceed, but it wouldnt drive them quite as hard, and in the past has lead to both deciding to let things stay as they are for now, more content to wait.

so i hope amd's process goes well, it cna only spark a more agressive and innovative response from intel if they want to get back in it.

ohh no i was just told (

screw you id rather have something working NOW, rather than sit and read about it being released 6 months from now on some german webite.. lets see now, reading about some new advanced processor that runs fast and cool, or how about actually being able to buy one?

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
<A HREF="http://www.subhi.com/keyboard.jpg" target="_new">This is you, interweb junky</A>

Stop flaming B!tch.

<font color=blue>My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.</font color=blue>

IPC is instruction per clock, A64 running at 2.xx ghz can compete/beat P4 at 3.xx because they do more work every clock cycle...

That 2ghz higher Ipc chip could be describe as ummm let me think Dothan?

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-3-3-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0

lol!

<font color=blue>My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.</font color=blue>

You are right!! Especially with that big AMD 64 at the bottom.

Because xeon said it looked like an xp.

Sorry for having to pull the thread on XS.

I was asked by AMD to remove the content because it is unreleased and I complied to stay in good graces with AMD.

<b>My sig is better than yours.<b>

Interesting things are bound to happen. Intel still has breathing room, but very little hype. They'll probably bring out worthwhile processors because of the pressure, but with a certain delay (say, 2005). In any case, it's a win-win situation for the customer.

Just imagine if Prescott was a screaming processor and dissipated <100W, and could scale to 4~5Ghz easily as promised. Imagine if Intel had no trouble whatsoever in enabling the 64-bit extensions in prescott. What would be the fun in that? If that were the case, then we probably wouldn't have the processors we'll get from Intel in 2005.

I mean, P-M is the future. Dual-core PM that is. Just picture a dual-core 2.13+Ghz Dothan with 4MB cache on a 1066Mhz FSB and 64-bit extensions (they'll have to get the FSB to 1066, after all, in order to be compatible with LGA775... it's twice the 533Mhz FSB we'll see in laptops).... If we see these processors by 2005, it'll be better than seeing "just" a simple 4.x Ghz Prescott <i>without all the innovations</i> they'll have to introduce to catch up! If they get a dual 2.13Ghz Dothan out the door before AMD can ready dual-core processors, they'll be well into the game... that's a big if, however, and there's also 64-bit.

Interesting outlook for the future... even if a bit unpredictable.

<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>

Intel's releasing 3.73Ghz, 2mb L2 1066FSB by end of this year. Tejas stuff without the name on Scotty. Waiting on the benchies on that one. Next year dual core Cpu. 3Ghz would be real sweet.

To my knowledge all 865PE boards support the Prescott. What mobo model?

<A HREF="http://fugger.netfirms.com/52ghz.jpg" target="_new">5.2Ghz from Prescott</A>Current #1 non-LN2

Northwoods cant touch this. The new D0 steppings are unreal. Ive seen 5.1Ghz from a MachII cooler

<b>My sig is better than yours.<b>

Oppainter is working on 939 now, nothing .09 micron yet.

<b>My sig is better than yours.<b>

This one:

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/prod [...] hp?UID=454

and here is the page on CPU support for the board:

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/prod [...] 454&kind=1

It's a good board, shame about no Prescott though. If I was an overclocker I would be pissed, but I plan on getting a 2.8GHz C and waiting until this 64 bit business sorts itself out.

<A HREF="http://ricserv.servebeer.com" target="_new"> My website </A>

I will go slap MSI and have them fix it. That board is supposed to support Prescott. The chipset does for sure.

<b>My sig is better than yours.<b>

prescotts are fine once you move past any equally clocked northwoods. we are talking for ppl that dont buy a mach II for overclocking here, clock for clock the prescott didnt outperform, but now that it has clock rates outside of the northwood, they will be the ebtter choice down the road. right now, upgrading toa prescott core is about as smart as buying into lg755 today. best to wait for a bit.