Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

1066 bus??

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • Bus
  • Processors
Last response: in CPUs
Share
August 9, 2004 7:00:37 AM

I hear that Intel is going to release processors with this buss speed. How much extra performance will actually come from this buss increase? Does anyone know if the processors will come in 2.8 ghz speeds?

I was just thinking... What kind of FSB speeds can these guys reach on the OC if they come at low speeds like 2.6 or 2.8.. Interesting..

"If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a
wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!"

More about : 1066 bus

Anonymous
a b à CPUs
August 9, 2004 1:48:32 PM

P4 loves mem bandwith it should give him a nice boost. Specially paired with 2 mb of cache!

I didnt hear of any lower clocked 1066 Prescott altough we will probly see some lower than 3.73ghz I doubt will see any below 3ghz cuz these chip are aimed at higher end sector. Altoguh I could be wrong...

Paired with DDRII 667 with an unlocked 925XE it could probly reach some nice speed with water cooling(at least =Þ )

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-4-4-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0
August 9, 2004 3:01:37 PM

yes, the Prescott 3.73ghz with 2mb L2 1066fsb should perform roughly the same as a P4 3.46EE 2mb L3 1066fsb. Can't wait to see the benchmarks. I think we will see a substantial increase in performance.

------
Prescott 3.2E 1MB L2 HT
1GB PC 3200 Dual channel(PAT)
Asus P4P800 Bios 1016
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
60,823 Aquamarks
Related resources
August 9, 2004 3:09:59 PM

I think a 3.73Ghz, 1066Mhz FSB P4F with 2MB L2 (and EM64T) might even be enough to level the playing field with current AMD processors... to a reasonable level. Intel is getting beaten up in availability and performance right now. It must NOT carry EE's price tag, though, or it will have no impact.

If Intel takes too long, though, AMD might release a 4000+... which will make things that much harder.

<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i>
August 10, 2004 7:50:27 AM

Grr.. Only if Intel chips where cheaper. Why do they charge so much for a chip that is beat by one that is $300 cheaper. So sad. Mabie intel will catch up to amd one day.

"If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a
wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!"
August 10, 2004 8:27:48 AM

A64's are scaling to 2.6ghz pretty easily

if they can impliement whatever manufacturing process they did with the athlonxp's that allowed them to get to 2.5ghz+, then they should have no problem releasing the 4000+

what i dont like is how AMD's naming scheme is always too hgih. the 3500+ should be the 3400+, the 3200+ should be the 3000+ and so on... kinda lame, because the Intel equivilent to the AMD model number is usually a tad faster

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>

Brand name whores are stupid!
August 10, 2004 8:29:47 AM

hopefully itll only be a few hundred dollars

i might consider getting one of those beasts, even tho i dont need one at all .. lol

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>

Brand name whores are stupid!
!