Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Mobile P4 w/HT 3.4 ghz?

"Power wise" meaning battery life related, right ? A64 ought to be better, but neither will be really good. If batterly life is your main concern, I would suggest looking at a Pentium M.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =

Pentium M for sure.

Very high performance, very low power usage, and 64-bits won't be needed on laptops until you are ready to upgrade anyway.

<font color=white>-</font color=white>
Wanted: Large breasted live-in housekeeper. Must be a good cook, organized, and willing to pick up after me.

Shouldn't you be recommending a 85W "mobile" Prescott ? I mean it does have this all important SSE3 and 1Mb cache and it is without a doubt the most "powerfull" notebook money can buy. In fact, its so powerfull you'll burn your fingers while typing! that is, if the battery doesn't catch fire first, and you don't get a heart attack watching your cat get sucked into, and consequently chopped into pieces and spit out again by the 130 dBA, 200 CFM fan.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =

Not an answerable question. Laptops come as a whole package. You can not say I want this cpu, this graphics card, this hdd, this ram, this screen.
The way things are right now, packages for Intel are much better than for A64.

I would probably go with the Pentium for mobile so for once... Kanavit is probably correct. However since you are new here I must inform you that Kanavit is a blubbering idiot who really doesn't know his head from his as$. Just look at the Aquamark forums, he is even infamouse there, the title of the thread is "First Run New Laptop Toy....Kanavit will Poop, it's a P4! OMG!". So... just warning, don't listen to anything else he says...


ANYTHING ELSE

AMD 64 3400+
MSI K8N Neo Platinum
1 GB Kingston HyperX PC3200
ATI AIW 9600XT
WD Raptor 74GB

OMG WOLFMASTERPRIME LOL. hes amazing, such a fanboy. look at his signature (he or someone in that forum makes those for members), and look at the labels and marketing terms. they are define brand-name whores


that benchmark favors nvidia cards and Intel chips. basically the opposite of real life, and these guys eat it up. i tried participating in that forum, but those guys are.. .well.. clueless


half them dont even know what i meant when i mentioned clock speed of the ram and gpu, explaining how to overclock. <A HREF="http://www.designwolf.com/images/lapcrapsmall.jpg" target="_new"> Look, his laptop has 513 megs of ram LOL!</A>

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>

Brand name whores are stupid!

they are novices, too bad because otherwise it would be an interesting place to post

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>

Brand name whores are stupid!

Your quote from aquamark boards, "btw, thx for supporting Intel"
WTF was the point of saying that???
Do you work for them or something?
Why are you so inlove with a company?
Jesus christ, I'm afraid if you ever meet the president of intel you'd wildly butt rape him!!!

Watch out for the <b><font color=red>bloody</font color=red></b> Fanboys!

AMD64 2800+ :: MSI Neo-Fis2r :: 512mb Kingmax ddr400 :: Sapphire 9800pro 128mb :: 10K WD Raptor

They may be novices, but did you see WMP's aquamark score on his systems. 72,889 with an A64 is pretty high for a novice, but 68,149 on an xp, now that is something.

I must agree, i think that would be the best day of Kanavit`s life.

Not the best day for the Intel President, because he would not be able to sit on a chair the first weeks, he would remember Kanavit a long loong Time.
Mhew maybe he likes it )




Toms Hardware Site is a joke !
Looks like intel spent more on bribing reviewers to cover up it aint that great than they did in R&D, you know what im talking about Tom !

how the hell do you get 6200 in 3dmark03 with a 9600?