Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

AMDAthlon64 3000+ / IntelP4 2.8GHz??

Last response: in CPUs
Share
August 17, 2004 4:13:55 AM

hi, i wanted to know which processor is faster:

Intel Pentium 4 2.80E GHz 800FSB w/ 1MB Cache
or
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ / 512KB Cache / 1600MHz FSB / Socket 754 / Processor 2.0GHz

please give me some feedback..i dont know much about computers =\. thx
August 17, 2004 4:20:04 AM

Please see <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?nam..." target="_new"> this </A> thread should help.

If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
August 17, 2004 4:24:59 AM

1600 FSB?
I dont think so. Both chips have 200. Intel quadpump theirs. Amd is double.

"If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a
wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!"
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by clob on 08/16/04 06:28 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
August 17, 2004 4:43:21 AM

1600 FSB basicly tells you it's 800MHz up and 800MHz down at the same time.
Athlon 64 is 4x200 unlike Athlon XP.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by piccoro on 08/17/04 00:43 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
August 17, 2004 6:07:05 AM

This is very vague, what will you be using it for?

AMD 64 3400+
MSI K8N Neo Platinum
1 GB Kingston HyperX PC3200
ATI AIW 9600XT
WD Raptor 74GB
August 17, 2004 10:22:33 AM

In most apps, the Athlon 64 3000+ will be faster than the P4. In video/audio encoding the A64 will be a bit slower (but not in all apps).

--
A7N8X / <font color=green><b>AMD Sempron 2800+</b></font color=green>
Kingston DDR333 2x256Megs
<font color=red>Radeon 8500 128Megs</font color=red> @ C:275/M:290
August 17, 2004 12:55:32 PM

Quote:

In video/audio encoding the A64 will be a bit slower (but not in all apps).


Indeed, in ALL the rest the A64 will be faster, in games the difference is huge !



Toms Hardware Site is a joke !
Looks like intel spent more on bribing reviewers to cover up it aint that great than they did in R&D, you know what im talking about Tom !
!