AMD V INTEL

[dondon]

I have a choice of two chips
Which is better performance wise?
Intel Pentium 4 2.52Ghz
or AMD Athlon XP 2800 333 FSB

 

[sparky853]

It depends on what you plan on doing with it as to which one is a better performer. Generally speaking, AMD performs better for gaming and Intel performs better at multimedia tasks.

Personally, with a choice between those two, I would go AMD, simply because it would (likely) be cheaper.

I'm sure if you look hard enough you could find some benchmark scores.

Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4

 

[sparky853]

<A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-22.html" target="_new">Benchmark Link</A>

Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4

 

[dondon]

Thanks for the help.
I thinks I'll go with the AMD
I dont any games though.
just music & DVD's etc

 

[peteroy]

Then Pentium 4 will outperform that Athlon XP.

Pentium 4 has SSE2 which Athlon XP doesn't.

===========================
<A HREF="http://www.clancas.net" target="_new">clan CHAOS</A>

 

[trooper11]

ok and lets remind the class where sse2 pays off?

thats right, its in video work.

now id liek to hear why you think sse2 will help HIM. he doesnt do any video encoding so most of the bonuses sse2 provides will not give anything.

i will say that HT is a bonus for the p4 over the athlon, but counting hte price difference in that as wlel, that bonus is a wash and both are basically equal. he will enjoy is athlon xp.

 

[Guest]

Pete why you keep bringing up SSE?It will help under certain circonstance but its not magical!It wont do miracle and your computer wont boot faster ya know

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-4-4-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0

 

[Cybercraig]

I'll take...................................neither of those choices!

Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4ghz - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - Yellowtail Merlot

 

[endyen]

SSE2 can be a lot of help. It will give a 10% edge, if you compare only with SSE2 progs. To get this advantage, go out and buy new software that only supports it. Ignore better software, that may be faster, if it does not support SSE2. In gaming, SSE2 helps with demos and "on the rails", if it is supported. Do not play these games, as they run slower than the demos.
See, I can be as stupid as Petertoy.

 

[apache_lives]

That model P4 (P4 2.53ghz / 533fsb) doesnt have Hyperthreading - only the 3.06ghz / 533mhz model and the C Class models (800mhz FSB) have HT. He wants a 'usefull' cpu for more 'desktop' things rather then games - the P4 will have more performance (thanks to more cache and the fsb) while the AMD is close performance wise it falls short (just) for his areas... not that its bad or anything.

 

[DonnieDarko]

He wiln't respond. He never does. You tell him he's wrong, then he doesn't respond. If anyone needs to be banned it's petey. He gives bad advice and even after being told what he says is wrong he keeps repeating it too newbies who want REAL advice.

Watch out for the <b><font color=red>bloody</font color=red></b> Fanboys!

AMD64 2800+ :: MSI Neo-Fis2r :: 512mb Kingmax ddr400 :: Sapphire 9800pro 128mb :: 10K WD Raptor

Addicted, finally.

 

[endyen]

Perhaps we should ask Freddi to give him a " moron of the month" award.

 

[DonnieDarko]

LOL
more like "tool of the month" from the abuse he takes from us making fun of him. But till he starts posting good advice based on REAL benchmarks and REAL info, then i will continue to prove him wrong. (or till he gets banned)

Watch out for the <b><font color=red>bloody</font color=red></b> Fanboys!

AMD64 2800+ :: MSI Neo-Fis2r :: 512mb Kingmax ddr400 :: Sapphire 9800pro 128mb :: 10K WD Raptor

Addicted, finally.

 

[endyen]

The Amd PR numbers were fairly close to the P4b numbers.
You can not say that an Xp2800+ is slower than a P4b @2.53. Well obviously, you did, so show me.

 

[apache_lives]

"fairly close" - 2800+ is "fairly close" to 2.53

 

[darko21]

endyen is correct xp is very close in benchmarks to the p4b. Sure you could run a specific benchmark to show one better over the other but all in all a tie.

xp rating smoked the p4a, tied the p4b, and was tramplied by the p4c.

end of story.

If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.

 

[endyen]

In chips 10% is for ever. The xp2800+ is 10% faster than the P4 2.53. End of story.

 

[Snorkius]

End of thread!

<font color=blue>The day <font color=green>Microsoft</font color=green> will make something that doesn't suck is the day they'll start making vacuum cleaners.</font color=blue>