XP2200+ (266MHz FSB), 1GB Dual-Channel DDR333, BBA R9800 Pro running at 4xAGP
P4 2.4b (533MHz FSB), 1GB Single-Channel DDR333, BBA R9800 Pro running at 8x AGP
In all seriuosness, which one will perform better? I have to option to switch at no cost to myself, and was wondering if the Dual Channel and 8xAGP capabilites would be worth the switch?
Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4
Also, keep in mind that I can also upgrade the XP2200+ to an XP3200 with DDR400 RAM in the near future.. whereas the P4 board is not upgradeable (not for a reasonable price anyways.)
Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4 <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by sparky853 on 08/27/04 01:25 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
You'll gain a rip-roaring 3% advantage with dual channel on that board. You will see NO advantage in 8X AGP vs 4X AGP. The buss outruns all current cards.
Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4ghz - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - Yellowtail Merlot
One other reason I am asking is because I have having some stability problems with the P4 board with the R9800 using CAT 4.4 and above. I get VPU recovery errors and have even got a "Sync Out Of Range" error.
Its not the PSU (I changed to a 420W PurePower - no change), its not the RAM (tested with MemTest86 - OK), its not the video card (had the same problem with my R9600XT), and its not the monitor (changed monitors - same result).
I have reformatted and reinstalled all the latest drivers and have not seen a change.
Therefore, its down to motherboard.
I may try the XP2200+ with the 9800 Pro and see if it resolves the instability issue. Even if there is not a noticible difference, if it solves the stability issue, that may be worth the swap alone.
Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4
Why didn't you tell me it was an MSI board? I would have told you to pitch it in the river. My best buddy plays Doom3 on 1024 X 768 HQ with a 2.0B and a 9600XT-256mb. On a SOYO board no less.
Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4ghz - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - Yellowtail Merlot
I'm glad the Amd system is giving you some relief. What make and model is the new mobo?
If the problem with the P4 started recently, it could just be a dust problem, on the mobo, or on the hsf.
According to the benchmarks, the 2.4 performed a bit better, partly because the RAM ran at 333, the 2200 runs the RAM an 266, but I can OC the 2200.
Quote :
I'm glad the Amd system is giving you some relief. What make and model is the new mobo?
If the problem with the P4 started recently, it could just be a dust problem, on the mobo, or on the hsf.
I used the Abit NF7 mobo. Being more stable, the XP2200, even with a slight performance drop, is worth it. The problems started after installing some newer CAT drivers. There is very little/no dust on the heatsink/fan.
I think it was a combination of the SiS AGP drivers/AGP 4x/CAT drivers that was the problem with the MSI P4 board.
Intel P4 2.4B, MSI 645E Max-U Mobo, 1GB DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, SB Live 5.1, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4
I was actually quite happy with the MSI board, up until just recently. I never really had a reason to go beyone the 4.3 drivers, cause they worked flawlessly.
I really only needed the upgrade because of the stability issues with Doom
XP2200+, Abit NF7, 1GB Dual-Channel DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4
P4 2.4b is faster than AXP 2200+ when paired with RDRAM or Dual channel DDR. With single channel DDR333, AXP 2200+ and P4 2.4b should perform nearly equal.
DDR266 is good enough for 266 FSB AXP if you don't overclock
Quit your search now! Get a 3.0C Northwood with the D1 stepping. I have this dog at 3.5ghz at stock Vcore and 39C! Unbelieveable. I wonder what I'll have to do to get it to 3.6ghz? Flatter it?
Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4ghz - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - Yellowtail Merlot
Word to the wise. Your mobo tends to undervolt, so raise your v-core to 1.675, at least, and v-dimm by a 1/10th or 2. This should give the required voltages.
I just got rid of a P4 2.4b because of stability problems, although the problems were with the mobo shipset/AGP drivers/CAT drivers, not the CPU itself.
And besides, the mobo I had didn't support 800MHz FSB.
XP2200+, Abit NF7, 1GB Dual-Channel DDR333, ATI R9800PRO 128MB, TT PurePower 420W, Samsung 120GB, Maxtor 120GB, LG DVD+-R/RW, WIN2K PRO SP4
Well Sparky, your prayers have been answered! You can get a 3.0C with D1 stepping and a <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?description=13-139-144&DEPA=0" target="_new">free</A> motherboard for it! Now all you have to do is clock the pants off of it!
Abit IS7 - 3.0C @ 3.6ghz - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - Yellowtail Merlot
Dont get the 2800+, get an xp-m2500+ They are about $40. cheaper, have unlocked multiplier, OC like a banshee.
I think there is some misunderstanding that the regular XP chips don't overclock well or something. Generally everyone gets the mobile 2500 up to 3200+ (2.0 - 2.1 ghz) speeds no problems. There are some advantages to the mobile chip, as it does run a little cooler, but in the end the 2800+ is still a faster chip (2.08 ghz stock), and will overclock farther.
Even in hot enviroments my 2800 runs at 2.5 ghz, now that it is in the cool basement, 2.6 is stable. I don't know many 2500+'s that run these speeds on air cooling.
Yes the 2800+ is a little more exspensive, but with the extra speed, who knows, you may not even have to overclock.
Oh.. and endyen, not saying you have the misunderstanding about the XP chips, I know you understand this. Just my opinion I wouldn't, completely rule out the 2800+. (I think the price jump to the 3000+ and 3200+ would rule them out though.)
My Desktop: <A HREF="http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc.html" target="_new">http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc.html</A>
Overclocking Results: <A HREF="http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc2.html" target="_new">http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc2.html</A>
Few xp2800+ chips available today get above 2.2 Most xp-m chips run well at 2.4, a good oc guy can get to 2.6+ on air, higher on water. The xp-m can also be clocked/ volted down for those hot desert days, when the ambient gets close to 60c, or for someone who wants a low noise system.
I'm confused, why does when the 2800+ chips are made make a difference? I purchased my retail 2800+ recently (It's about a 1.5 months old, from a major retailer), and it overclocks fine. I am not sure what would limit them to 2.2, even my friends 2700+ goes well past that without problems.
Generally I haven't run into any 2800+ chips that won't at least make it to 400 fsb speed. In cool enviroments, many go past this. Maybe I have just had good luck?
Quote :
The xp-m can also be clocked/ volted down
You do have an excellent point there though, the lower voltages that the mobile chips can run, is a strong point for them, especially as the 2800+ and up chips are known for running a little warm.
My Desktop: <A HREF="http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc.html" target="_new">http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc.html</A>
Overclocking Results: <A HREF="http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc2.html" target="_new">http://Mr5oh.tripod.com/pc2.html</A>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.