OK, first, read some of this link on AMD's site:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_861_9633^9616,00.html#74659
Then, I ask:
People go and buy mobile xp chips and then OC them massively cuz of their nice thermal ability and well, they are made better as it seems in general.
Someone told me that an XP-M goes at 133x11 fsb and non M goes 166x14 FSB.
I believe people OC them way above this, am I correct? And if so now what about the Athlon64?
I am looking at the athlon 64 3200+, the one thats 2.0 ghz and has 1MB L2 cache. I see that AMD has it under the DTR chip category.
Does this mean its the same chip with better cooling?
A slower FSB chip with better cooling?
The same darn thing with a better board that supports cool and quiet?
Something else that wouldnt be ever on par with a regular, desktop rated 754 slot 3200+ with 1MB L2 cache?
Pick one or something please! and whats the OClocking headroom on these badboys?
Peace
El Jefe
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_861_9633^9616,00.html#74659
Then, I ask:
People go and buy mobile xp chips and then OC them massively cuz of their nice thermal ability and well, they are made better as it seems in general.
Someone told me that an XP-M goes at 133x11 fsb and non M goes 166x14 FSB.
I believe people OC them way above this, am I correct? And if so now what about the Athlon64?
I am looking at the athlon 64 3200+, the one thats 2.0 ghz and has 1MB L2 cache. I see that AMD has it under the DTR chip category.
Does this mean its the same chip with better cooling?
A slower FSB chip with better cooling?
The same darn thing with a better board that supports cool and quiet?
Something else that wouldnt be ever on par with a regular, desktop rated 754 slot 3200+ with 1MB L2 cache?
Pick one or something please! and whats the OClocking headroom on these badboys?
Peace
El Jefe