Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » 2.4 ghz A64 3400??
 

2.4 ghz A64 3400??




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 2.4 ghz A64 3400??
 
FOF
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi

I recently ordered a socket 754 A64 3400+. As far as I'm aware, the 3400+ was clocked at 2.2 ghz with 1 mb L2 cache, yet the vendor insists that the version they stock is a 2.4 ghz version with a 512k L2 cache.

Am I missing something or is the vendor mistaken? If such a product exists, my question is why make two different chips but call them the same name?

Thanks

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Honorary Master of THGC
More Information

Is it possibly a typo or maybe vendor is selling an overclocked chip, or mobo combo at this speed?

========================
Try everything...
Do not be afraid of failure, for this is how we learn and grow...
Live life to the fullest...
Do not regret what you have not yet done!!!

FOF
Profile: stranger
More Information

Well I thought it was a typo as well to be honest, so I contacted them to let them know about the "error" to which they insisted that it's 512k L2 cache and 2.4 ghz. They also have an A64 3200+ that's supposedly got a 2.2ghz clock speed in their price list.

Usually their product info is 100% correct, and they're not some dingy little backyard business that's into overclocking factory items or anything like that, so I'm eagerly awaiting this mysterious chip to see just what the heck is going on...but ANY instability or funny business and the chip goes straight back.

I'll keep you guys informed.

Profile: Honorary Master of THGC
More Information

Read and understand their return policy...
Otherwise, you might get stuck with shipping and restocking...Without CC co. getting involved...



========================
Try everything...
Do not be afraid of failure, for this is how we learn and grow...
Live life to the fullest...
Do not regret what you have not yet done!!!

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

yup, one is Newcastle core(512kb)L2, and the other is the Clawhammer core(1mb)L2. CLawhammer are clocked at 2.2ghz with rating of 3400+, and the Newcastle is clocked at 2.4ghz with same rating. Newcastles are only half the size of the Clawhammer, but higher frequencies make it faster than the Clawhammer stock speeds.

<A HREF="http://hardware.fr/articles/496/page1.html" target="_new">Source</A>

------
A64 3400+ Newcastle
1GB PC 4000 Kingston HyperX
Asus K8V basic Bios 1004
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
70,261 Aquamarks

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

~"Newcastles are only half the size of the Clawhammer" - I think you mean they have half the Cache (512K) but double have an extra 200Mhz to compensate.

_______________
STFU

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

actually the Newcastles are only half the size of the clawhammers on 130nm process. the Newcastles have only 68.5 million transistors(144mm2), and Clawhammers have 105.9 million trasnistors(193mm2).

<A HREF="http://www.hardware-mag.de/hardware.php?id=254&page=2" target="_new">source</A>

------
A64 3400+ Newcastle
1GB PC 4000 Kingston HyperX
Asus K8V basic Bios 1004
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
70,261 Aquamarks

FOF
Profile: stranger
More Information

That's really interesting...I presume when you say Newcastle (in this case) you're referring to socket 754?

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

yes, i am using s754. however s939 also uses newcastle core to, so good pt there.

------
A64 3400+ Newcastle
1GB PC 4000 Kingston HyperX
Asus K8V basic Bios 1004
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
70,261 Aquamarks

Profile: member
More Information

half the die of one that has 512k L2 has been turned off. its really just excess transistors. the number of transistors dont really mean much.

I personally would just go for the high clock value and ditch the 1 meg L2 if there was a preference.

NOt only does a 200 mhz make it faster than 512k more on die, but even a slight oc to 2.1 would be faster than 512 more L2.

Clock speed and memory controller is what makes a 939 so fast. its really hte same thing as a 754 2.8, just rated higher and dual channel memory.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Well if its the 512k l2 cache then yeah 2.4ghz is about right. The Clawhammer core with 1mb l2 cache was 2.2ghz while the 3200 clawhammer was 2.16 i think. Just make sure that vendor has a good return policy.

<i><font color=red>Only an overclocker can make a computer into a convectional oven.</i></font color=red>

Profile: newbie
More Information

actually the clawhammer 3200+ is 2.0 ghz
the amd 64s always go down 200 mhz from one model to the next (with the same cores)

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Yeah thats right, just knew the 64bit 3200 is lower then 32bit 3200 in clock.

<i><font color=red>Only an overclocker can make a computer into a convectional oven.</i></font color=red>

Profile: Tom's Hardware Team
More Information

Since you mentioned overclocking!

If you had a Clawhammer 3400+ 2.4GHz and a Newcastle 3400+ 2.2GHz and both reached 2.6GHz overclocked, the Clawhammer would still have more cache and they'd be clocked the same.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>


Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

AMD rolls out new mobile Athlons

Published on July 19, 2004

AMD today announced new processors for notebooks. The Mobile Athlon 64 processor 3400+ extends the product line on the top-end, the XP-M 2200+ allows AMD to enter the Tablet PC market. Read more

Nvidia releases PCI Express-based Quadro family

Published on June 28, 2004

Nvidia today introduced four new Quadro professional graphics solutions based on PCI Express. Read more

AMD Releases Sub-$100 Graphics Cards

Published on January 23, 2008

Discrete graphics are advancing deeper into the mainstream segment with AMD's new Radeon HD 3000 series, offering DirectX 10.1 and DisplayPort functionality as well as the ability to handle 1080p high definition video for prices starting at about $50. Read more

AMD debuts "Oakville", launches 90 nm Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Published on September 20, 2004

AMD expands its mobile product line by adding the first Oakville chip to its low-power Mobile Athlon 64 lineup. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ steps up the performance of the existing 2700+ and 2800+ low power versions of the processor. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more