The 2.4ghz one will be faster in most cases. If your going to overclock you may as well get the 2.2ghz with the 1024kb l2 cache because both will overclock to similiar speeds.
-----------------------
oh, its a nice day. TO EAT CHILDREN!!!
I have the 2.2 1MB Cache but I have it overclocked to 2.6. The Cache size doesn't matter as much on 64s, so generally it's better to get the higher speed; I didn't do much research before buying either (don't get the same ram as me).
Thanks for the replies...
I got the 2.2 1M now and it's running smooth a 2.4 on air... i'm probably gonna try to OC higher when i get my water cooling kit back
and Sorry about the repost, i had just joined the forums so i didn't notice the search function
I have mine at 2.6 on air without any problems. I've never messed with water cooling, thought about it, but every time I do I say to myself "why am I putting water inside my computer." Just doesn't seem smart to me, GL though, talk to scottchen.
i got a 2.4ghz newcastle 512kb and believe me, cache doesnt really matter on AMD systems because of Hypertransport(on-die memory controller). I got some pretty amazing scores with my newcastles.
clock for clock the Clawhammer 1mb is faster than Newcastle 512kb, however the Newcastle is faster than the clawhammer at stock. 200mhz increase clockspeed is better than 1mb cache.
And the Claws does clock for clock with newcastles, if not better. You'd think that the smaller die size on the newcastles would generate less heat and have chance to go higher, but read somewhere that newcastles are just defective clawhammers.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.