Hi guys, what is the difference betweem 3000 amd 3000+ amd processors, i've seen that one is 90nn the other is 130nm, what does this mean and which one is the one to get/ cheers
The two cpus dont use the same socket so you'll need a different mobo for each one.
Signature (up to 200 characters). You may use <font color=blue><b>Markup</b></font color=blue> in your signature<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by coylter on 11/23/04 07:27 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
As the other user mentionned there is different flavor of AMD 3000+ cpu...
Here is the list (from the slowest to the fastest):
NAME|SOCKET|SPEED|CACHE|FSB|MEMORY CHANNEL
Sempron 3000+|A|1.8GHz|256K|333MHz|Depend on MB
Athlon XP 3000+|A|2.166GHz|512K|400MHz|Depend on MB
Athlon 64 3000+|939|1.8GHz|512K|400MHz|Dual Channel
Athlon 64 3000+|754|2.0GHz|512K|400MHz|Single Channel
The Sempron 3000+ is meant to be compared to a Celeron D 3.0GHz (not yet available). The Athlon XP 3000+ is comparable to a P4C 2.6GHz/2.8GHz and both Athlon 64 3000+ are comparable to P4C/E 3.0GHz. In most situation, the extra 200MHz of the Athlon 64 3000+ S754 make this 3000+ faster compared to is Socket939 brother. But the Socket 939 3000+ is the newest flavor of AMD64 made with a 90nm process. These beast can easily reach 2.4 to 2.6GHz on air cooling. Very good overclocker!
-
A7N8X / <font color=green><b>Sempron 2800+</b></font color=green> <- <i>Is this affecting my credibility?</i>
Kingston DDR333 2x256Megs
<font color=red>Radeon 8500 128Megs</font color=red> @ C:275/M:290 <- <i>It's enough for WoW!</i>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.