Pentium-M 2 GHz as fast as FX-55 and Pentium EE

<A HREF="http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=dothangaming&page=1
" target="_new">Clicky</A>

_______________________
<A HREF="http://www.moviewavs.com/MP3S/TV_Shows/Simpsons/flanderssong.mp3" target="_new">Audio Sig</A>
 
I think he meant to link to <A HREF="http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=dothandesktop&page=1" target="_new">this</A>

_______________________
<A HREF="http://www.moviewavs.com/MP3S/TV_Shows/Simpsons/flanderssong.mp3" target="_new">Audio Sig</A>
 

coylter

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2003
1,322
0
19,280
Holy crap, thats intel savior right there!!!

Signature (up to 200 characters). You may use <font color=blue><b>Markup</b></font color=blue> in your signature
 
meh, it's good - but the chipsets suck ass.

It could be Intel's savior IF they decided to upgrade to a 200Mhz * 4 FSB, with HT etc.

_______________________
<A HREF="http://www.moviewavs.com/MP3S/TV_Shows/Simpsons/flanderssong.mp3" target="_new">Audio Sig</A>
 

jammydodger

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2001
2,416
0
19,780
I dont understand why they dont convert the 865/875 so it can be used with the dothan. I heard that the northwood and dothan were pin compatible so it cant be that hard to do.
 

zother

Distinguished
Dec 1, 2004
12
0
18,510
I wonder what would happen if they had some really nice cooling on the chip. How far could they have pushed it??

For my next PC project I might consider picking up a Pen M and overclocking. I just hope the new chipset that intel is promising is out by then.

-----------------------------------
AMD 2500+ @ 2.2GHz
Abit NF7-S v2
WD Raptors 74GBx2 RAID 0 & WD 120JB
1GB Dual Channel Mushkin 2.3.3.7
ATI AIW 9700
Watercooled
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
meh, it's good - but the chipsets suck ass.

It could be Intel's savior IF they decided to upgrade to a 200Mhz * 4 FSB, with HT etc.

this isnt netburst, quad data rate fsb migth not help it

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
Brand name whores are stupid!
 
oh yeah, of course it aint. My bad.

Well, a 200Mhz bus would still help

_______________________
<A HREF="http://www.moviewavs.com/MP3S/TV_Shows/Simpsons/flanderssong.mp3" target="_new">Audio Sig</A>
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
yea fo sho

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
Brand name whores are stupid!
 

RichPLS

Champion
I can't wait till my next upgrade, about 6 months away :(

<font color=red><pre>\\//__________________________________
And the sign says "You got to have a membership card to get inside" Huh
So I got me a pen and paper And I made up my own little sign</pre><p></font color=red>
 

trooper11

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2004
758
0
18,980
ok ok calm down, take a breather here and take a small does of reality here.

how many threads are going to be started about this one test with a dothan, and then people running around try to make sacrifices to the great dothan god lol. hey its a great notebook processor, but its not ready for desktop use yet.

now about this deal, if 2.5ghz was reached using a vapochill, then this achievement is way overblown. you realize 90nm athlon 3000+ can do 2.5-2.6 ghz on AIR? 3200+ can do 2.6-2.7 on AIR and a 3500+ can do 2.8 on AIR?

i mean im glad to see that the dothan is a good prospect, but man, seeing the same posts over and over is taking alot out of it lol.
 

Vapor

Distinguished
Jun 11, 2001
2,206
0
19,780
S478 and S479 are 0% similar! Though the pin counts are nearly identical, the actual implementation of the pins are COMPLETELY different--a socket converter couldn't even do the job. As for i875/865 being used, a hackedup version might work, but I don't know how well, it's feature set would be better, but performance would likely be the similar (Dothan needs a bigger FSB most of all from what I can tell).

Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
I find it hard to believe anyone is finding all of this hard to believe after all this time, I've been on it for weeks in here.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
But supposedly the ICH5 is pin compatable with the ICH4, so they could have at LEAST put the ICH5 on there, even though it's not an "official" match according to Intel. From there, the ICH5R could have elminated any need or desire for a third party SATA RAID controller.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 

Kocur

Distinguished
Oct 19, 2004
4
0
18,510
Hi Abbo,

CPU reviews by GamePC are a joke. It is even not worth reading.

Since there are still no reviews of Dothan by "big boys", please check articles on www.tecchannel.de (in german) and www.extremetech.com for more accurate results.
 

jammydodger

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2001
2,416
0
19,780
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2129&p=4" target="_new">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2129&p=4</A>says here the dothan is electrically compatible with the P4, the pins are in a different place but it suggests to me that a socket converter would work.
 

slvr_phoenix

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
6,223
1
25,780
Isn't the PM based on the P3 core?

<pre><b><font color=red>"Build a man a fire and he's warm for the rest of the evening.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life." - Steve Taylor</font color=red></b></pre><p>
 

jammydodger

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2001
2,416
0
19,780
From Anandtech.com
That being said, there's nothing stopping a motherboard manufacturer from producing a desktop motherboard that supports the Pentium M processor - because once again, the Pentium M is electrically compatible with the Pentium 4 and should thus work with any desktop Pentium 4 chipset.
So I dont understand why they dont make 865/875 boards with a dothan socket on them. That platform would rule. Fcuk Intel approval, the company that did it would make shed loads.
 

slvr_phoenix

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
6,223
1
25,780
It's just kind of funny is all. I mean Intel ditched the P3 for the P4 and now look what they're able to do with a core derived from the P3. Maybe they should have just taken AMD's route and kept making improvements to the same old core. :\

<pre><b><font color=red>"Build a man a fire and he's warm for the rest of the evening.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life." - Steve Taylor</font color=red></b></pre><p>
 

slvr_phoenix

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
6,223
1
25,780
So I dont understand why they dont make 865/875 boards with a dothan socket on them. That platform would rule. Fcuk Intel approval, the company that did it would make shed loads.
From what I've read the pins are all switched around, but straighten that out and it should be compatible, more or less. However, losing Intel's approval while supporting Intel products is not exactly good for anyone's business. :\ Whatever profit that they can make doing this is bound to be mitigated by the money lost when Intel gets pissed at them.

I'm kind of surprised that VIA hasn't tried something like this yet. Oh wait. No I'm not. It'd totally crush their EDEN/EPIA line if they did. :O Heh heh heh.

<pre><b><font color=red>"Build a man a fire and he's warm for the rest of the evening.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life." - Steve Taylor</font color=red></b></pre><p>
 

TRENDING THREADS