amd64 3000+ oc performance comparison

hey i've managed to get my amd64 3000+ (winchester 939) running at 2.43 ghz as oppossed to 1.8ghz. Would this oc really give me a performance rating close to that of a 3800+ which runs at 2.4ghz and has the same amount of cache?
6 answers Last reply
More about amd64 3000 performance comparison
  1. Sure?

    Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
  2. Yes

    ______________
    OK it's your choice:
    You can have the boat, or you can have the Mystery Box!
    ...Hey wait a minute! A boat's a boat, but a Mystery Box could be anything. It could even be a boat
  3. I would say faster, since more memory bandwidth is available.

    <pre><font color=red>°¤o,¸¸¸,o¤°`°¤o \\// o¤°`°¤o,¸¸¸,o¤°
    And the sign says "You got to have a membership card to get inside" Huh
    So I got me a pen and paper And I made up my own little sign</pre><p></font color=red>
  4. thats great, saved me a couple of hundred quid. Is there any kind of benchmark that i could use for comparing my processor against others interms of performance?
  5. Prime95. Sandra. F@H, Seti, WinRAR, Various Encoding Benchmarks.

    a Program written in Qbasic do do something meaningless 3 million times and tell you how long it took :wink: .

    Any of those.

    ---
    "Sex without love is an empty experience...
    But as empty experiences go, it's one of the best" - Woody Allen
  6. I would go with Sisoft Sandra, gives simple plain results to compare directly with other cpu's.
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Performance Cache