Archived from groups: rec.games.pinball (
More info?)
I've stated all I'm going to on rgp in
regards to this thread. From now
on, all you're going to get is a "rerun".
It is not a cop-out as stated. I've given
the reason(s) in a previous post in this
thread, and I suppose you will have to
be content with that. It is more than just
my opinion, you can be sure.
I have dealt with Chad privately as well.
--
Fred
TX
CARGPB#8
******************
"Joseph A. 'Tony' Dziedzic" <tonydz@comcast.net> wrote in message news:UumdnRQISsM_y77eRVn-1w@comcast.com...
> Yes, it is a cop-out, and your reference to "rgp history" is just a diversion.
> Either you have the facts to support your position, or you don't. If the
> former, then provide the facts for the folks who have asked a question that
> indicates they are trying to learn something. If the latter, then simply
> admit it, and quit trying to dress up an opinion and present it as something
> else.
>
> To elaborate, one of the folks who asked about the differences (Chad) is a
> relatively new collector from the New England area; he's been working to bring
> a neglected TZ back into working order. We've been helping him on the Boston
> Pinball Yahoo group, and he's made excellent progress over the past few
> months.
>
> One of my first suggestions to him was to buy a PinLiz proxmity sensor board
> to fix his recurring switch #26 problems; that's what I do for the TZs that I
> restore. I think the Liz's stuff is well-engineered, and I've always had
> positive dealings with Joel.
>
> Now Chad needs a clock board set, and wants to learn WHY he should pay about
> $50 more for one option over another. Customer service is certainly a valid
> point, but can you enumerate any technical reasons that make the Liz's clock
> board set better than Jim (Rottendog) Knight's? I've heard that Jim also goes
> out of his way to support his products, although I've never personally bought
> anything from him.
>
> Tony
>
> In article <dfv74v11q3s@enews4.newsguy.com>, "Fred Kemper"
> <pbgarage@davlin.net> wrote:
> > Not a cop-out, it's a matter of history on rgp.
> >