Hynix Semiconductor has increased its 0.11-micron DRAM production yield rates at its 12" M10 fab in Icheon, South Korea, according to sources in Taiwan. Read more
Prices for low-density SDRAM chips used in consumer-electronic devices may continue to plummet in the fourth quarter, amid increasing supply, according to sources with IC distributors. Read more
Intel and Micron Technology recently started releasing 8Gbit NAND flash memory chips, fabricated by their joint venture IM Flash Technologies, to the spot market, and customer feedback is satisfactory, according to market sources. Read more
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is expected to migrate all of its CPU production to 90nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) processes in early 2005, according to sources at Taiwan motherboard makers, citing AMD's latest roadmap. Read more
Interested in overclocking but not quite sure where to start? We round up some of our favorite software utilities for tweaking processors, memory, graphics, and chipsets. Read more
Welcome to the first installment in our six-part Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide. In Part 1, two beautiful models help showcase some of our favorite no-hassle hardware gifts for 2008. Read more
Executives, road warriors, and gadget geeks all lust after ultraportable notebooks. Five of these amazing machines battle it out in this roundup. Read more
For the first time ever, gamers are being treated to a reasonably priced platform enabling the best that AMD and Nvidia have to offer. Is Core i7 a gamer’s nirvana or does the processor serve up more of the same? Read more
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : AMD 90nm vs. .13 micron?
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
i am interested in buying a AMD processor
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
90nm chips have a 45% smaller core size, require less power, run cooler, and overclock better.
|
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
No, the fact that they're based on 90nm processes doesn't mean they're faster, it basically means they probably run a lot cooler.
|
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
Yup, that's it....
|
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
lol, you're right about the SSE3 Extensions - but they are only in the latest Vencie core - and who knows when we will see those on the shelves!
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
do they actually run faster though?
|
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
They will run at the same speed at the same rating. The 90nm isn't faster -<i> but you could make it easily....</i>
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
i`m not really too crazy about OCing stuff
|
|
Profile: Master Historian of THGC
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
From what I recall, an A64-3500 is 1% faster on 90 nanotech. A 3200 would be much slower, so @ the same price, take the 3500.
|
|
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
Arnold, exactly how many questions do you need to ask before you get off your butt and build a system?
|
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
All of them. |
|
Profile: Forum Master
More Information
|
Twice.
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
well just when i think i narrow the cpu down to and 64 3500+
|
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Yeah... Dualcore and R520! R520 isnt untill June I believe
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
|
