Actually I meant more like if both the 3700+ and 3800+ reach the same mhz speed, the San Diego will be faster due to the 1MB L2 cache.
EDIT: Hmmm I just realized, perhaps scale was the wrong word to use here.. Okay, let me see if this makes it more clear, the Sand Diego's <i>performance</i> scales better with clock speed than the Venice.
<A HREF="http://nfiniti.blogspot.com" target="_new">nfiniti plus one - my blog</A><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by chuck232 on 05/15/05 11:12 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
What would be a better processor:
the Athlon 3700+ San Dieogo with its 2.2 Ghz and 1Mb L2 cache
or the Athlon 3800+ Venice with 2.4 Ghz and a 512Kb L2 cache?
I think you need to read his initial post again. :wink:
With the A64s I'm pretty sure it is better with more cache. I know the P4 6xx series isn't necessarily better than the 5xx series but that's cause the 2MB L2 cache in the 600 series has higher latency than the cache in the 500 series.