Best for gaming?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819116190

or

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819103529





I was considering http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819103527 , but it's really too expensive. And how much better is it than the non FX san diego?


<font color=blue> There's no such thing as hell, but you can make it if you try.</font color=blue>

For less than what the Pentium costs I would get <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103547" target="_new">this</A>

<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

Or if you want the bigger cache then the 4000+
Come to think of it the X2 also has 1M cache but it's for 2 CPUs

<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

How does that dual core processor compare for gaming versus the vanilla 4000+ San Diego or the 3.8/3.6 intel?

Also, I need a different type of mobo, right?

<font color=blue> There's no such thing as hell, but you can make it if you try.</font color=blue>

AMD X2:
4200+ = 2 3500+'s in the same socket. (2.2ghz, 512kcache)
4400+ = 2 3700+'s " " " " (2.2ghz, 1024kcache)
4600+ = 2 3800+'s " " " " (2.4ghz, 512kcache)
4800+ = 2 4000+'s " " " " (2.4ghz, 1024kcache)

I'd say compared to the P4, 2.2ghz might not beat a 3.8 (in games), but its a close race. 2.4ghz probably beats the 3.8. But at this speed, no game will be CPU limited (*newest released games possibly excepted with slowest CPU)

Same mobo for all of them. Might need a bios flash until the 'pre-X2' stock is depleted. Only Intel requires a new mobo for dual core.

Mike.

</font color=blue>Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside the dog its too dark to read.
-- Groucho Marx</font color=blue>

I think, given the same core speed (i.e., 3500+ or X2-4200+), dual core will probably give a very slight increase in games (barely noticeable if at all) because of OS and other processes will likely be routed to the other core, leaving 100% of a core to the game (instead of 99% on a single core system).

But I could be wrong, having not seen any benchmarks either way.

Mike.

</font color=blue>Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside the dog its too dark to read.
-- Groucho Marx</font color=blue>

<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103539" target="_new">This</A> one is clocked 200MHz less but $150 cheaper.
What video card are you gonna use?
If you get a 7800 and the 3700+ San Diego will beat a 6800 and a 4000+ San Diego.



<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

That is only if he purchased the dual and the single core with the same core speed, which he wouldn't. If he goes single core he can use the money he saves from not getting dual core and buy a faster core speed single core. There is no question that a faster single core will have better gaming performance than a slower dual core.

That said, if you ever multi task during games (which I do on very rare occasion) then I would suggest going dual.

Yeah... we all know that he shouldn't have had the Intel on his list at all. But I also believe that unless he multitasks then the X2 shouldn't be on his list either. That is unless he believes that game designers are going to rapidly change the way they design games and make them more "dual core friendly". This might happen, but I think it will take over a year at the very least. After all, games that are just coming out now have been in the works for years, not weeks. It takes a long time to develop a good game, and even if they were starting to change that now (which I don't know if they are, I'm sure they will wait to see how popular dual core gets) it would still take over a year to produce those games.

I think I said that.

I agree with all your points.

Mike.

<font color=blue>Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside the dog its too dark to read.
-- Groucho Marx</font color=blue>

My budget is medium range.

I want a 7800GTX and a damn good proc, for sure. Other stuff is irrelevent.


Can someone link me a good mobo if the one I chose sux? :-P

<font color=blue> There's no such thing as hell, but you can make it if you try.</font color=blue>

With that video card you'll have a kick a$$ gaming rig no matter which Athlon 64 you choose.

.

<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

Drunk?
I don't need alcohol I can <A HREF="http://www.scamtron.com/php/dunklegend.htm" target="_new">GET HIGH</A> in other ways


<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

What if he lives in a cold place?

<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>

I'm sorry

<font color=red>Left to themselves, all things go from bad to worse</font color=red>