Pentium 4 2Ghz in January

G

Guest

Guest
Hi guys as Intel said (to The Register) it is going to bring Pentium 4 2Ghz in January :cool: (3 months earlier than planned), but I am not sure about RDRam :frown: . Still DDR support only in Q2 2001. Anyway I guess AMD should also go further. Here is <A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/14665.html" target="_new">source</A> to get more info.
 

SoulReaper

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
194
0
18,680
I will stay with my Athlon T-bird 1ghz vs the P4. Over the long run a lower speed Athlon will be faster than a higher speed P4. I think AMD finally got it's break it needs. RAMBUS is old news and DDR doesn't look that hot. We'll see the bentchmarks when DDR motherboards are available.
 

machow

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
855
1
18,980
Yes go ahead and pay $5000 for your 2GHz system and I'll stick with my $2000 system that performs 70% as well as your <i>dream</i> system.


Smart guys are not smart; they only see things in different perspective.
1st <b>member</b>!<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by machow on 11/14/00 06:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Yeah yeah Intel said... is it just me who see the similarity to 3dfx's Voodoo 6000? :p

Kjella
 
G

Guest

Guest
Do ANY of you believe an Intel Rep would say this:


"Expect to see P4 much earlier than on the roadmap - we're aggressively going for AMD's balls on the speed front. DirectX 8 is ready and lots of apps and games have been optimised, many more than for the PIII launch, which was a real cockup."

Sounds like a joke to me....
 
G

Guest

Guest
even if it is true that Intel will push the P4 to 2Ghz in Q1, then it says a bunch about its performance at 1.4Ghz, it is bad....:)

Thermal Acceleration means 'Overclocking'
 
G

Guest

Guest
I don't see how Intel can talk about anything in concrete terms when they have yet to actually launch the P4.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hehe. :cool: Sure. Intel is sucks. AMD is going to be my choice. Hehe (my smile for Intel is dead smile :wink: ). I am totally agree with you guys AMD - #1 choice these days.
Thanks for changing me from wrong way.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Sanik on 11/14/00 02:05 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hey,

Look at it this way. Even if Intel does get a big boost and reclaims the speed lead tghis isn't a problem for AMD. Due to the producing capabilities of Intel they can produce more processors than AMD ever could. This isn't bad though. From the little I've seen AMD has really been working to enhance and improve the Athlon. If they can still release higher speeds, and slowly up the fsb, they will always have a slight edge over the P4. All they need to do is not nose dive till the next generation of Athlons are out.

Timothy Stankus
One of the First AMD Athlon Users =)
 
G

Guest

Guest
> Do ANY of you believe an Intel Rep would say this

Two words: Hard Liquor :)
 

slvr_phoenix

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
6,223
1
25,780
Here is my thought: Why do we have 150MHz memory (obviously that is for overclockers) but we don't have 150MHz FSB chips? You'd think the easiest way to make a faster chip that has more headroom for advancement is just up the fsb.

- Anything can be fixed with duct tape, a swiss army knife, and WD-40. :)
 

Strife

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
107
0
18,680
It does not work that way. It would not matter whether you increased the frequency by rasing the FSB or the multiplier.

It would be no less difficult for AMD to release a 1500Mhz processor with a 150FSB and a clock rate of 10 as it would be for one with a 100Mhz FSD and a clock rate of 15;
 

Ycon

Distinguished
Feb 1, 2006
1,359
0
19,280
Why dont YOU stop spamming?

@ topic:
WOW, those guys just found out about a 2 GHz P4 =)
And so sad AMD Fanboys already existed back then.
 

Loup Garou

Distinguished
Jan 14, 2006
92
0
18,630
HEX
57 68 61 74 20 74 68 65 20 68 65 6c 6c 20 61 72 65 20 79 6f 75 20 74 61 6c 6b 69 6e 67 20 61 62 6f 75 74 3f

or

01010111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110100 01100001 01101100 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100001 01100010 01101111 01110101 01110100 00111111

???
 

qurious69ss

Distinguished
Mar 4, 2006
474
0
18,780
The year 2k.......wow that was a great year. Such an innocent time and quite a bit more piece of a$$ then I am currently getting. Thus me sitting in front of a monitor on a friday. Screw you for reminding me...........