I Want Wand of Far Slaying and Drakeling Acid Spit Damage ..

Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.adom (More info?)

Spoil me please.

Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.adom (More info?)

Nick Strnad wrote:
> Twinge wrote:
>
>> Higher Game wrote:
>>
>>> Spoil me please.
>>>
>>
>> Sure thing.
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>> Acid Spit:
>> The formula appears to be Max(PCLevel / 3,2)d6+Max(PCLevel / 3,2). There
>> was some weird stuff in the code but this should be accurate; should be
>> tested though. Should be the same for the sulphur corruption too.
>>
>> Lvl Damage
>> 1-8 : 2d6+2 (Average 9)
>> 9-11 : 3d6+3
>> 12-14: 4d6+4
>> ...
>> 48-50: 16d6+16 (Average 72)
>>
>> Your satiation goes down by 5d10+50 (Average about 77).
>
>
> Does the sulphur corruption decrease satiation too? I remember spitting
> the sulphur corruption for a while to try to decrease satiation to eat
> a corpse, but don't recall it going down. Perhaps I was super-bloated,
> or maybe it just doesn't decrease satiation.

It certainly does decrease satiation. I've used it for the same purpose
and it works just fine; sometimes you just have to spit 3-4 times,
sometimes more.

--
Curry Bucket's Controversial Web Presence:
The Birthplace of Teenage Angst
http://chat.carleton.ca/~jsingh3/
or http://www.currybucket.cjb.net/

Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.adom (More info?)

Gero Kunter wrote:
> Twinge <homelesspete@gmail.com> wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> Twinge, even though your posts are usually quite interesting, I have
> some problems with your way of quoting. Sometimes you answer several
> different posts in just one reply, and it's not always possible to
> sort out the attribution lines. Especially the first point is
> problematic for me, as I'm using a threaded newsreader, and am
> frequently confused when quotations from others appear in your
> articles without being in the article you're replying to. I'm quite
> certain that you know the r.g.r.a FAQ, and it's really clear about
> how to quote. So to improve my enjoyment of your posts [I'm being a
> flatterer here, see! ], please try more to stick to the usual
> conventions. Thanks in advance!

Fair enough. What would be the prefered method by the people here? I
assumed replying to each message individually would get kind of spammy
myself, but that's an option. The other way I'm thinking of is what I
did in the post I made right before this, where I made sure to leave who
said what but still did it all in one message.

Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.adom (More info?)

Twinge wrote:
> Gero Kunter wrote:
>> Twinge <homelesspete@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Twinge, even though your posts are usually quite interesting, I have
>> some problems with your way of quoting. Sometimes you answer several
>> different posts in just one reply, and it's not always possible to
>> sort out the attribution lines. Especially the first point is
>> problematic for me, as I'm using a threaded newsreader, and am
>> frequently confused when quotations from others appear in your
>> articles without being in the article you're replying to. I'm quite
>> certain that you know the r.g.r.a FAQ, and it's really clear about
>> how to quote. So to improve my enjoyment of your posts [I'm being a
>> flatterer here, see! ], please try more to stick to the usual
>> conventions. Thanks in advance!
>
> Fair enough. What would be the prefered method by the people here? I
> assumed replying to each message individually would get kind of spammy
> myself, but that's an option. The other way I'm thinking of is what I
> did in the post I made right before this, where I made sure to leave
> who said what but still did it all in one message.

fwiw, I don't have any problems reading your responses, *shrug* There may be
some issues I'm not seeing or aware of though, I don't use a heavy duty
newsreader (though I don't use google either)

Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.adom (More info?)

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:25:25 -0700, Twinge wrote:

> Fair enough. What would be the prefered method by the people here? I
> assumed replying to each message individually would get kind of spammy
> myself, but that's an option. The other way I'm thinking of is what I
> did in the post I made right before this, where I made sure to leave who
> said what but still did it all in one message.

FWIW, I find a separate message per reply much easier to read.