G
Guest
Guest
Initially I was thinking, "Man, that's stupid of Intel to make a processor that performs well on Internet apps but pretty bad on standard Workstation apps!" , in reference to the P4. However, at that time I was only thinking of my own computing needs: strong FPU performance (graphics creation). While Intel's P4 looks like my last choice for 3d Max and thus I would never likely buy one, it IS a good move for Intel. Currently the majority of computer consumers spend about 80% of their computing time on the internet. Additionally, they generally only run Office apps (like Word and Excel) and the Internet. All of today's processors seem more than good enough for standard office apps, so they've become a moot point. Intel is trying for the major market share which lies in the Internet now. The Internet itself is still in its infancy as far as what potential it has. Most likely, we'll see the Internet continue to grow and grow in terms of what services it offers. For example, streaming movies aren't too far off (just a bandwidth issue now). Eventually home-owners will be using a computer linked up to the internet to likely run most of their household. So, Intel is trying to establish it's dominance in this portion of the market. While AMD may very well forever-on be the FPU Graphics workstation King, Intel will probably manage to sell more processors in the future and keep that lead.
This is just a guess. For my part, I'll keep buying AMD so long as they deliver so much raw computing power for their price!
Charles
This is just a guess. For my part, I'll keep buying AMD so long as they deliver so much raw computing power for their price!
Charles