"The microprocessor market waited eagerly for AMD Tuesday to kick off the next 1.3-GHz speed grade for its Athlon MPU -- but the MPU firm reportedly felt under no such pressure and continued to keep the higher speed chip in the wings."
Quoted from:
http://www.ebnews.com/story/OEG20010306S0065
While I find it minorly humerous to hear the term MPU instead of CPU (even if they mean the same thing, I haven't heard anyone call it an MPU in ... too long to remember), I find it immensely sad that AMD would take such a stance.
We all have enjoyed the battle between AMD and Intel because it kept giving us faster and faster chips. And this was very preferable to when Intel was the clear chip leader and dictated to it's users when they were ready for faster chips to squeeze the most money out of their existing chips. I doubt many people could argue that it wasn't annoying when Intel was doing this.
And now AMD is taking the exact same stance. They (supposedly) have a faster chip, the 1.3GHz Athlon. But they refuse to sell it because their 1.2GHz already beats the P4. (At least this is the reasoning that AMD President Hector Ruiz gives for it.)
So what is AMD doing? They are refusing to put out faster chips even though they have them just so that they can bleed the consumers dry.
Could anyone ask for more solid proof that AMD doesn't care about it's customers any more than Intel?
And no, I'm not trying to start any flame wars by acting as a such-and-such zealot. Obviously I've just pointed out faunts in BOTH sides. The only side I am on is that of the truth.
- Sanity is purely based on point-of-view.
Quoted from:
http://www.ebnews.com/story/OEG20010306S0065
While I find it minorly humerous to hear the term MPU instead of CPU (even if they mean the same thing, I haven't heard anyone call it an MPU in ... too long to remember), I find it immensely sad that AMD would take such a stance.
We all have enjoyed the battle between AMD and Intel because it kept giving us faster and faster chips. And this was very preferable to when Intel was the clear chip leader and dictated to it's users when they were ready for faster chips to squeeze the most money out of their existing chips. I doubt many people could argue that it wasn't annoying when Intel was doing this.
And now AMD is taking the exact same stance. They (supposedly) have a faster chip, the 1.3GHz Athlon. But they refuse to sell it because their 1.2GHz already beats the P4. (At least this is the reasoning that AMD President Hector Ruiz gives for it.)
So what is AMD doing? They are refusing to put out faster chips even though they have them just so that they can bleed the consumers dry.
Could anyone ask for more solid proof that AMD doesn't care about it's customers any more than Intel?
And no, I'm not trying to start any flame wars by acting as a such-and-such zealot. Obviously I've just pointed out faunts in BOTH sides. The only side I am on is that of the truth.
- Sanity is purely based on point-of-view.