Fugger,
As a relativeltly neutral opinion, I would like to say I'm not going defensive on you. I appreciate the info. I do have an AMD. I haven't had any problems, however I have read of many problems and agree that they exist. Most of these, though, are from people overclocking, something that the processor wasn't designed for. That's not AMDs problem.
AMD processors are not perfect processors. If you get an Intel you will probably have less problems. However, although problems can occur with AMD, they can also occur with intel processors, and the problems that AMD users face are exagerated many times.
When you say the system costs the same after factoring in all the extra parts... what extra parts? My cooling fan cost me twenty bucks and I didn't need any extra parts, all my old components worked fine (everything from an old AWE32 soundcard to my network and firewire cards). I have also had no software incompatibilites with the AMD. Incompabitibilty is not much of an issue with AMD; yes, it is there, but it is so minor very few people run into it.
I know the pentium 4 beats the AMD sometimes. I also know the AMD beats the pentium 4 sometimes. They are both good processors. Except one is a lot less. Considering the size of Intel they should be the ones putting out faster processors for cheaper, don't you agree?
I have used Intel all my life, but at this point I would recommend an AMD processor to almost anybody as you can save a buck or two, or two hundred, or three hundred, or 400 hundred, or...
Maybe you have alot of money to spend on computer stuff, but at least for me, I am not rich, and my life doesn't revolve around having the greatest computer on Tom's Hardware Forum. But thats just me.
I agree with you; many people do say stuff like 'AMD is perfect' when they are not. AMD is not perfect. But they are good, and they are cheap, and the issues with them are often times exagerated, are result from people doing things to the processor that were never intended to be done to it.