NO PALIMINO UNTI L JULY
Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Here is a intesting article about palimino being delayed
till late summer, and the Athlon 1.3 is a Thunderburd NOT PALIMINO, which will be at 1.4 only..
the reason? as I have been saying AMD's cpu manufacturing cannot keep up with INTEL and they will only have .13 micron die widths next JAN, a YEAR and 1\2 BEHIND INTEL, which has had them since Coppermine..
here is the article...
No Desktop Palomino Until July? (AMD)
Posted By Brian Neal
Friday, March 9, 2001 - 11:31:22 AM
" Thanks to ChrisK and njoobee for posting about this story from the German magazine c't reporting on the impending introduction of AMD's Palomino, or lack thereof. According to c't, Palomino is only sampling just now, with production not expected until July. Morgan is on the same timeline as well, with the 0.13-micron versions slated for production in January 2002 for Thoroughbred and March 2002 for Appaloosa (which sounds a bit like the old schedule for Palomino/Morgan, minus a year).
The magazine's roadmap indicates that Palomino will be introduced at 1.4 GHz, with Morgan debuting at 950 MHz. This is later than what AMD stated during the Q4 conference call, which indicated a Palomino introduction late in the first quarter, with parts at 1.4 GHz and 1.5 GHz by Q2. c't's roadmap also points to a Clawhammer introduction late in the first half of 2002, though no specific dates are given.
Finally, the 1.3 GHz Athlon is said to be a Thunderbird. It is still very likely that we will see this chip at CeBit, but what about the rest? . """
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
till late summer, and the Athlon 1.3 is a Thunderburd NOT PALIMINO, which will be at 1.4 only..
the reason? as I have been saying AMD's cpu manufacturing cannot keep up with INTEL and they will only have .13 micron die widths next JAN, a YEAR and 1\2 BEHIND INTEL, which has had them since Coppermine..
here is the article...
No Desktop Palomino Until July? (AMD)
Posted By Brian Neal
Friday, March 9, 2001 - 11:31:22 AM
" Thanks to ChrisK and njoobee for posting about this story from the German magazine c't reporting on the impending introduction of AMD's Palomino, or lack thereof. According to c't, Palomino is only sampling just now, with production not expected until July. Morgan is on the same timeline as well, with the 0.13-micron versions slated for production in January 2002 for Thoroughbred and March 2002 for Appaloosa (which sounds a bit like the old schedule for Palomino/Morgan, minus a year).
The magazine's roadmap indicates that Palomino will be introduced at 1.4 GHz, with Morgan debuting at 950 MHz. This is later than what AMD stated during the Q4 conference call, which indicated a Palomino introduction late in the first quarter, with parts at 1.4 GHz and 1.5 GHz by Q2. c't's roadmap also points to a Clawhammer introduction late in the first half of 2002, though no specific dates are given.
Finally, the 1.3 GHz Athlon is said to be a Thunderbird. It is still very likely that we will see this chip at CeBit, but what about the rest? . """
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
More about : palimino unti july
well yeah I see what you mean, but I bought alot of rambus and INTEL stock and they have split numerous times,
so I did put my money where my mouth was luckily
and they are cheap now and I know they will both be at 100
by summer end again, as P4 and rambus are patented and untouchable, adn rambus owns DDR as well so they hedge their bbets as INTEL has with DDR
both win either way, chipset people are the only ones who lose when they bet one one
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
so I did put my money where my mouth was luckily
and they are cheap now and I know they will both be at 100
by summer end again, as P4 and rambus are patented and untouchable, adn rambus owns DDR as well so they hedge their bbets as INTEL has with DDR
both win either way, chipset people are the only ones who lose when they bet one one
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
FUNNY STUFF,
WWW.OVERCLOCKERS.COM
3/11/01 - Palominos Delayed Until July? Nope, looks like a German magazine got their hands on an outdated roadmap. Either that, or AMD lied through its teeth at an investor conference four days ago. I think not. Ed
"There's a newsblurb over at c't magazine
I tried figuring out what they said after a Babelfish translation, but some of their apparent comments made no sense at all, and others contradicted the roadmap. Maybe it was convoluted German.
Palomino
Desktop, >1.4Ghz
Samples 2Q '01
Production 3Q '01 July
We have another very recent roadmap that is a very official, very public roadmap from AMD here.
This one was presented by AMD at the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Semiconductor and Systems Conference last Tuesday. The roadmap is slide 20.
It says the following about Palomino:
Palomino
Desktop, >1.2Ghz
Samples 12/00
Production 1Q '01
This is what AMD told the world a whole four days ago. It said samples were out. It said production would start this quarter, and if they haven't already started, they don't exactly have too much time left.
If the c't roadmap is correct, that AMD roadmap presented last week contains a lot of lies.
I don't think so.
What does make sense?
The internal evidence of the c't roadmap indicates this is an outdated one. Maybe it was accurate last October or November, but Jerry Sanders indicated in the 4Q conference call that a number of items had been moved up. The c't roadmap doesn't indicate that, but the Morgan Stanley roadmap does.
The Morgan Stanley roadmap consistently follows recent AMD comments, the only new twist is Palomino at 1.2Ghz+ (earlier, Mr. Sanders had definitely indicated 1.4Ghz was a Palomino, but was unclear about the 1.3Ghz). This may or may not mean the 1.3Ghz or 1.33Ghz chips are Palominos; we could well have 1.3Ghz TBirds and Palominos.
Looks like AMD is bringing up Palomino a bit earlier and starting at a lower speed than expected late last year.
When Can We Get Real Proof?
CeBit in two weeks. If Palomino is showing up any time soon, AMD will show it, and say when we can expect it. If it doesn't show up, then we know there's something wrong. "
THAT the whole thing, CUT AND PASTE just for you, I was afraid you might not know how to get to the link, since you haven't pass highschool and stuff. AND how long was P4 been delayed. wasn't it suppose to be out some one year ago.
OHHh and also, werent palomino suppose to debut at 1.7, OH my,.... AMD got some 1.2 on palomino core. and they coming out as a 1.4 DELAY,.....??? hmmmm,... EARLY for the boat??? hmmmmm
WWW.OVERCLOCKERS.COM
3/11/01 - Palominos Delayed Until July? Nope, looks like a German magazine got their hands on an outdated roadmap. Either that, or AMD lied through its teeth at an investor conference four days ago. I think not. Ed
"There's a newsblurb over at c't magazine
I tried figuring out what they said after a Babelfish translation, but some of their apparent comments made no sense at all, and others contradicted the roadmap. Maybe it was convoluted German.
Palomino
Desktop, >1.4Ghz
Samples 2Q '01
Production 3Q '01 July
We have another very recent roadmap that is a very official, very public roadmap from AMD here.
This one was presented by AMD at the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Semiconductor and Systems Conference last Tuesday. The roadmap is slide 20.
It says the following about Palomino:
Palomino
Desktop, >1.2Ghz
Samples 12/00
Production 1Q '01
This is what AMD told the world a whole four days ago. It said samples were out. It said production would start this quarter, and if they haven't already started, they don't exactly have too much time left.
If the c't roadmap is correct, that AMD roadmap presented last week contains a lot of lies.
I don't think so.
What does make sense?
The internal evidence of the c't roadmap indicates this is an outdated one. Maybe it was accurate last October or November, but Jerry Sanders indicated in the 4Q conference call that a number of items had been moved up. The c't roadmap doesn't indicate that, but the Morgan Stanley roadmap does.
The Morgan Stanley roadmap consistently follows recent AMD comments, the only new twist is Palomino at 1.2Ghz+ (earlier, Mr. Sanders had definitely indicated 1.4Ghz was a Palomino, but was unclear about the 1.3Ghz). This may or may not mean the 1.3Ghz or 1.33Ghz chips are Palominos; we could well have 1.3Ghz TBirds and Palominos.
Looks like AMD is bringing up Palomino a bit earlier and starting at a lower speed than expected late last year.
When Can We Get Real Proof?
CeBit in two weeks. If Palomino is showing up any time soon, AMD will show it, and say when we can expect it. If it doesn't show up, then we know there's something wrong. "
THAT the whole thing, CUT AND PASTE just for you, I was afraid you might not know how to get to the link, since you haven't pass highschool and stuff. AND how long was P4 been delayed. wasn't it suppose to be out some one year ago.
OHHh and also, werent palomino suppose to debut at 1.7, OH my,.... AMD got some 1.2 on palomino core. and they coming out as a 1.4 DELAY,.....??? hmmmm,... EARLY for the boat??? hmmmmm
Related ressources
- "FX-64 To Be Released The 8th Of August" - Forum
- The AMD Jump - Forum
- Hot hot bug bug again with the new AMD/via chipse - Forum
- This may start a fight... oh well - Forum
- Crysis 4870 benchmarks (includes CF): - Forum
YEah you believe AMD at a morgan stanley stock conference
what do you think they will tell you..
it is delayed I have heard from several sources
YEah well I passed HS and I have a finance degree from College you [-peep-] nutsack sucking meathead..
C-
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
what do you think they will tell you..
it is delayed I have heard from several sources
YEah well I passed HS and I have a finance degree from College you [-peep-] nutsack sucking meathead..
C-
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
Quote:
YEah well I passed HS and I have a finance degree from College you [-peep-] nutsack sucking meathead..ROFLMAO That alone was worth all the bickering! LOL
Yeah and guess what! I have a masters degree in diplomacy you nutsucking crap faced butthead
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
TYPO, SORRY
C-
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
C-
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
Has anyone here gone to CyberImages website? It's chalk full of spinning images and flashy things! And, COLORS!
Dude, get a clue. You want to have a business have a website that looks like a business website, not like some Geocities site dedicated to Pokemon....
"We put the <i>fun</i> back into fundamentalist dogma!"
Dude, get a clue. You want to have a business have a website that looks like a business website, not like some Geocities site dedicated to Pokemon....
"We put the <i>fun</i> back into fundamentalist dogma!"
Yeah, sure and your are such a expert critic on business..
we do 5 million in sales a year and growing,
our clients include some 20 universities, NASA, SONY,
GM, SPRINT, THE AEROSPACE CORP., JUSTICE DEPT., M.I.T,
SEALY MATTRESS, the US NAVY, etc etc
now what was that you were saying about our business not being professional,
you are so far off you nucksack sucking, felching pile of monkey dung..
stop insulting me and I will do the same..
until that day
have a good one
CAMERON
now wh
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
we do 5 million in sales a year and growing,
our clients include some 20 universities, NASA, SONY,
GM, SPRINT, THE AEROSPACE CORP., JUSTICE DEPT., M.I.T,
SEALY MATTRESS, the US NAVY, etc etc
now what was that you were saying about our business not being professional,
you are so far off you nucksack sucking, felching pile of monkey dung..
stop insulting me and I will do the same..
until that day
have a good one
CAMERON
now wh
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
You are doing $5 million in business off of that website??? Doubtful... You don't even have a shopping cart! I would never buy from a site that is constructed like that. Hell, my first company website I built myself looked better than that. Anyways, I wasn't meaning to insult you, but your website. Obvisouly it offends you so much to call me a "felching pile of monkey dung," which is a pretty lame insult in and of itself. Oh well though...
"We put the <i>fun</i> back into fundamentalist dogma!"
"We put the <i>fun</i> back into fundamentalist dogma!"
HI,
ok, maybe I overreacted with your insult, so I take back the money dung thing
no actually I did not say we did 5 mil just from the website, actually that only accounts for about 18%
but it is improving every month,,
are you kidding I would love it if our site would do that..
then I could work less
ha ha
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
ok, maybe I overreacted with your insult, so I take back the money dung thing
no actually I did not say we did 5 mil just from the website, actually that only accounts for about 18%
but it is improving every month,,
are you kidding I would love it if our site would do that..
then I could work less
ha ha
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
About Cyberimage,
Hey guys, it's all about how well your site works. If it provides customers with information and takes their orders while allowing you to fulfill the orders properly, then who cares about how it looks? It's just like in highschool, who gives hoot whether you wear the designer clothes, etc? You have your friends who aren't so low that they judge your clothes and you have your academics and sports, etc - it's all just about how it works.
Although, having said that, I would never ever buy from Cyberimage due to the immaturity, verbal attacks, slanderous language, and poor excuse for an adult behavior that I have seen CYBERIMAGE display. I'm assuming you are not a representative for your company to other large companies and/or consumers, otherwise I would be led to believe that your profits are coming from Middle/South America as a happy little green plant
.
Please try to ammend your behavior with acceptable terms, as your current method is extremely disgusting and repulsive, although downright hilarious
.
Thanks,
Calvin
Hey guys, it's all about how well your site works. If it provides customers with information and takes their orders while allowing you to fulfill the orders properly, then who cares about how it looks? It's just like in highschool, who gives hoot whether you wear the designer clothes, etc? You have your friends who aren't so low that they judge your clothes and you have your academics and sports, etc - it's all just about how it works.
Although, having said that, I would never ever buy from Cyberimage due to the immaturity, verbal attacks, slanderous language, and poor excuse for an adult behavior that I have seen CYBERIMAGE display. I'm assuming you are not a representative for your company to other large companies and/or consumers, otherwise I would be led to believe that your profits are coming from Middle/South America as a happy little green plant
.Please try to ammend your behavior with acceptable terms, as your current method is extremely disgusting and repulsive, although downright hilarious
.Thanks,
Calvin
HI ,
i agree with some of your post, and have to say the only reason Crhis and I insulted some is that we were hit by a barrage of insulting remarks from those who we in turn retaliated back against
if you look at some of the nice posts that were sent to us like yours, then we respond in kind...
actually I am one of the people who deals in the largest senor accounts, and am a manager and co owner along with several others...
of course our clients do not insult us the way some people on here have, so you can see how your view is somwhat
skewed
hope that answers your questions
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
i agree with some of your post, and have to say the only reason Crhis and I insulted some is that we were hit by a barrage of insulting remarks from those who we in turn retaliated back against
if you look at some of the nice posts that were sent to us like yours, then we respond in kind...
actually I am one of the people who deals in the largest senor accounts, and am a manager and co owner along with several others...
of course our clients do not insult us the way some people on here have, so you can see how your view is somwhat
skewed
hope that answers your questions
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
no don't worry it was funny,
and involves all the above you mentioned and MORE
)
he he
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
and involves all the above you mentioned and MORE
)he he
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
Take a lesson from "Stable Technologies". If you are an expert, then present yourself as one. Be a "Class Act". Don't go off the wagon because a nasty post came your way.
Stable Technologies has not tried to inflame anyone, and has not responded in kind to insulting posts. Based on your posts, I would avoid your company like the plague.
You have potential customers here. Did that occur to you? If I were in the market for an Intel system, do you think your posts would attract me? They make me think "does he treat his customers like this?".
The last thing you would want are some fanatics here spreading bad words about your company on other forums.
Stable Technologies has not tried to inflame anyone, and has not responded in kind to insulting posts. Based on your posts, I would avoid your company like the plague.
You have potential customers here. Did that occur to you? If I were in the market for an Intel system, do you think your posts would attract me? They make me think "does he treat his customers like this?".
The last thing you would want are some fanatics here spreading bad words about your company on other forums.
Point well taken and you are right,
just sometimes people can make you lose yor temper..
thanks for cooling me down
look forward to exchanging with you again soon
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
just sometimes people can make you lose yor temper..
thanks for cooling me down
look forward to exchanging with you again soon
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
It's happened.
Got to www.resellerratings.com, and view the comments for your company. You have 1 very positive comment, and 1, well, fabricated comment that you should address (add your response to resellerrattings) in a calm manner.
I take Resellerratings very seriously, and will only buy from a vendor that has a hundred or more votes and a rating of 5.5 or higher.
You have some damage control to attend to. You can post your response to resellerratings.com.
Exchanging words in the forum is one thing, but to purposly attempt to sabotage ones business is simply nasty, IMMORAL and wrong.
Got to www.resellerratings.com, and view the comments for your company. You have 1 very positive comment, and 1, well, fabricated comment that you should address (add your response to resellerrattings) in a calm manner.
I take Resellerratings very seriously, and will only buy from a vendor that has a hundred or more votes and a rating of 5.5 or higher.
You have some damage control to attend to. You can post your response to resellerratings.com.
Exchanging words in the forum is one thing, but to purposly attempt to sabotage ones business is simply nasty, IMMORAL and wrong.
thanks I saw that, and we contacted the sysop and gave him the guys IP \ DNS address and they will investagate the guy
if he does not take it down.
I agree a lame thing for him to do , but we are calling our attorney's today if he does not remove it and going to file a cease order to remove it and then possible sue him for Libel..
sometimes jokes go to far..
thanks for all your help, you seem like a really cool guy
best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
if he does not take it down.
I agree a lame thing for him to do , but we are calling our attorney's today if he does not remove it and going to file a cease order to remove it and then possible sue him for Libel..
sometimes jokes go to far..
thanks for all your help, you seem like a really cool guy
best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
HI Mike,
thanks, yeah,
there are some twisted individuals out there,
but we are taking aaction so he will get his.
thanks for the support though
)
best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
thanks, yeah,
there are some twisted individuals out there,
but we are taking aaction so he will get his.
thanks for the support though
)best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
I am sorry man, I lost the original thread so I am not sure what to let you all know about..
I think if you meant the false and misleading post you are referring to then it was NOMORELAMERS who did that..
if that was not your question please let me know what you were referring to so I do not sound insane
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
I think if you meant the false and misleading post you are referring to then it was NOMORELAMERS who did that..
if that was not your question please let me know what you were referring to so I do not sound insane
take it easy
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
Oh OK,
well he retracted this post here and resellerratings
was contacted by our attorney and they removed his post there..
thanks for the help and concern,
nice of you
best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
well he retracted this post here and resellerratings
was contacted by our attorney and they removed his post there..
thanks for the help and concern,
nice of you
best
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
I quite agree....
there are limits in everything..
and I suspect you and I have more similarities than differences, just from you recent posts..
hell, I can get past the fact that you use an AMD
(totally Kidding)
talk to you soon I hope
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
there are limits in everything..
and I suspect you and I have more similarities than differences, just from you recent posts..
hell, I can get past the fact that you use an AMD
(totally Kidding)
talk to you soon I hope
CAMERON
CYBERIMAGE
<A HREF="http://www.4CyberImage.com " target="_new">http://www.4CyberImage.com </A>
Ultra High Performance Computers-
!