AMD Processor PRices!!!!! *FAINT*
Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $279 for a 1.33GHZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND IT JUST CAME OUT
HOLY CRAP
DO YOU REMEMBER 2 YEARS AGO WHEN NEW PROCESSORS CAME OUT?!!! ALMOST $1k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this is insane
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
HOLY CRAP
DO YOU REMEMBER 2 YEARS AGO WHEN NEW PROCESSORS CAME OUT?!!! ALMOST $1k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this is insane
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
More about : amd processor prices faint
Related ressources
- Faint Burning/metallic smell from pc - Forum
- Ways to bump down the price on this computer? - Forum
- AMD Piledriver rumours ... and expert conjecture - Forum
- AMD slashes processor prices - Forum
- Can you bash AMD and look @ yaself in the mirror - Forum
cause intels [-peep-] and the guys were on crack when they were pricing it
"um.......ya....hahaha.....$3...hehhe.....um.........uh............$700.....for.......a.........1.3mhz....ya thats......um.....a.......more......like it"
my impression of the guys workin at intel.
I am too lazy to type a signature
"um.......ya....hahaha.....$3...hehhe.....um.........uh............$700.....for.......a.........1.3mhz....ya thats......um.....a.......more......like it"
my impression of the guys workin at intel.
I am too lazy to type a signature
Okay - Intel stop making processors and you are head of marketing for AMD.
What do you think you'll be doing with your next generation CPU pricing? Do you think you'll feel you'll keep prices low beacuse AMD is a charity?
Intel have high prices because major manufacturers and customers (i.e. commercial - not retail) use Intel.
AMD are cheap because they have to be. this is great for us. If they were a monopoly - you'd be bitching about AMD prices too...
-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details
What do you think you'll be doing with your next generation CPU pricing? Do you think you'll feel you'll keep prices low beacuse AMD is a charity?
Intel have high prices because major manufacturers and customers (i.e. commercial - not retail) use Intel.
AMD are cheap because they have to be. this is great for us. If they were a monopoly - you'd be bitching about AMD prices too...
-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details
I absolutely agree with you there. If AMD was on top, I have the utmost faith that every single bean counter working behind a cubicle would statistically prove it is more profitable to price every manufactured processor 400% over cost.
Greed is like the speed of light in a vaccuum. They are both constant for the majority of cases.
Greed is like the speed of light in a vaccuum. They are both constant for the majority of cases.
"What are you talking about dude. I said "when new CPUs come out" not non-clock for clock"-Grizely1
So if we're going clock for clock, the P4 1.3 is about the same price as the T-bird 1.33. Of course experts don't want the P4, but it does show that the prices, as good as they seem in retrospect, are nothing special at this time. If AMD had a 1.7GHz processor and Intel only a 1.33, AMD would probably want almost 4 times as much for it as well. Also, AMD is making a lot more money per unit than Intel, because the P4 is so expensive to produce! So as far as Intel beeing overpriced or greedy, AMD is making more money per unit (they just sell fewer units), so I guesse that would make AMD greedy? All companies price their product at whatever the market will bear, so they are all greedy. The P4's "suckyness" has nothing to do with corporate greed, it simply shows how Intel fell behind on new products. If we want to see if they will recover, we must wait. As for AMD, they seem to be doing good right now. Let's hope that AMD keeps comming out with the good stuff, competition drives prices down. As for me, I'll upgrade to the fastest socket 370 CPU available for my current machine next fall. Maybe someone like Evergreen will make an overdrive to put the new PIII on the old socket.
Suicide is painless...........
So if we're going clock for clock, the P4 1.3 is about the same price as the T-bird 1.33. Of course experts don't want the P4, but it does show that the prices, as good as they seem in retrospect, are nothing special at this time. If AMD had a 1.7GHz processor and Intel only a 1.33, AMD would probably want almost 4 times as much for it as well. Also, AMD is making a lot more money per unit than Intel, because the P4 is so expensive to produce! So as far as Intel beeing overpriced or greedy, AMD is making more money per unit (they just sell fewer units), so I guesse that would make AMD greedy? All companies price their product at whatever the market will bear, so they are all greedy. The P4's "suckyness" has nothing to do with corporate greed, it simply shows how Intel fell behind on new products. If we want to see if they will recover, we must wait. As for AMD, they seem to be doing good right now. Let's hope that AMD keeps comming out with the good stuff, competition drives prices down. As for me, I'll upgrade to the fastest socket 370 CPU available for my current machine next fall. Maybe someone like Evergreen will make an overdrive to put the new PIII on the old socket.
Suicide is painless...........
1.2 Ghz Athlon 266 FSB is now $198 plus $11 in shipping....
1.3 Ghz P4 is $260 + $13
(although the next option is at $290+)
Either way the price difference is DRAMATIC. Intel's drop didn't do much for me....they still aren't competitive..
<font color=red>Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.</font color=red>
Pablo Picasso
1.3 Ghz P4 is $260 + $13
(although the next option is at $290+)
Either way the price difference is DRAMATIC. Intel's drop didn't do much for me....they still aren't competitive..
<font color=red>Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.</font color=red>
Pablo Picasso
I read on zdnet sometime ago that AMD are making less money per unit than Intel. They're doing that to do increase sale figures and secure a larger market share. This is likely to drive up their share prices.
There is nothing right now to justify the cost of intel p4 processors. Perhaps, when the next generation of the p4 is out and lots more software to make use of the p4 'optimizations'. In my opinion, this version of the p4 should never have been released!
<i><b><font color=red>"2 is not equal to 3, not even for large values of 2"</font color=red></b></i>
There is nothing right now to justify the cost of intel p4 processors. Perhaps, when the next generation of the p4 is out and lots more software to make use of the p4 'optimizations'. In my opinion, this version of the p4 should never have been released!
<i><b><font color=red>"2 is not equal to 3, not even for large values of 2"</font color=red></b></i>
With shipping roughly $280 for p4 1.3
$255 for the 1.33 T-bird. Still a 10% difference. But not bad. Hopefully they'll release their new P4 at these prices, but we both know they won't so we'll be left with the same dilemma.
<font color=red>Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.</font color=red>
Pablo Picasso
$255 for the 1.33 T-bird. Still a 10% difference. But not bad. Hopefully they'll release their new P4 at these prices, but we both know they won't so we'll be left with the same dilemma.
<font color=red>Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.</font color=red>
Pablo Picasso
Quote:
But Intel is no longer overpriced.hjHHAHAHAHHA HA HAH AHAAH AHHA..... $766 for the new P4, right? $270 for the new 1.33GHz TBird, right? That's almost three times as much. Which one performs better? HAHAHAH AH AH AHHAHAH AHAHAH AHA.....
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
Yeh and $54 for the new Cyrix 3. So what's your point? The price of the P4 and Athlon are close, clock for clock, the 1.3 v 1.33. I suppose if AMD released a 1.7GHz chip for $750, you would still compare the price of the 1.33? Of coarse the P4 still sucks, but it is competitively priced for people who still want it. If I were to build a new system RIGHT NOW it would probably be an Athlon system on the ALi chipset. I love the 760 but it is only available with a VIA southbridge on any motherboard I can think of. Really with all the changes taking place in architechture, I would rather wait to see what happens this fall. And I like my PIII system, so I will probably upgrade it. If no one realeses a new style PIII modified for the socket 370 I will probably opt for a 1GHz chip and overclock it.
Suicide is painless...........
Suicide is painless...........
I said "Which one performs betteR". The Cyrix3 performs like a Duron 600. Doesn't count.
"I suppose if AMD released a 1.7GHz chip for $750, you would still compare the price of the 1.33"
Nope. The 1.7 would overpower the 1.33. The point is, P4 1.7GHz doesn't overpower the 1.33.
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
"I suppose if AMD released a 1.7GHz chip for $750, you would still compare the price of the 1.33"
Nope. The 1.7 would overpower the 1.33. The point is, P4 1.7GHz doesn't overpower the 1.33.
-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone will ever need!"
Bill Gates, 1980s
Looks like it will with the lack lusty computer sells going on. Supposenly the material cost to manufacture chips is rather cheap plus the T-Bird is proving to be able to go higher than AMD ever expected in the current core. So AMD is getting a break in producing faster chips without having to retool their plants with newer technology saving them and us money in the short run. Just think a 1.33mh T-Bird for less than $200!!! It is close. The big question is why even produce Durons when slower T-Birds will be less than $100?
cant we all just get along? NO it will never happen. Can't the democrats and republicans get along too? Intel had its grip for a long time. AMD maybe moving in, but who knows whats going to happen later. All I care is that the prices ARE going down on any chip I might get soon. I would rather have an AMD chip and a sweet video card than an intel system which is supposed to be the same. What matters is that the prices are going down for smart people that get behind the marketing propoganda from companies like Compaq, Dell, Gateway and HP.
100w of heat??? Lets use ohm's law and figure out the current necessary for 100 watts. <b>Power = Current x Voltage</b>, therefore <b>Current = Power/voltage = 100w/1.75v = 57amps</b>. 57amps!!!
Now not all the electrical power used by the cpu is converted into heat so I doubt very much that a 1.6ghz T-Bird would produce 100w of heat. Especially if it is only using 60-70 watts total. My 400w power supply can only supply 30amps at +5 volts. Not sure of the real heat output and I could be wrong, anyone can enlighten us?
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by noko on 03/31/01 08:47 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Now not all the electrical power used by the cpu is converted into heat so I doubt very much that a 1.6ghz T-Bird would produce 100w of heat. Especially if it is only using 60-70 watts total. My 400w power supply can only supply 30amps at +5 volts. Not sure of the real heat output and I could be wrong, anyone can enlighten us?<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by noko on 03/31/01 08:47 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Related ressources:
- ForumIntel VS AMD - Don't expect falling prices on higher end processors
- ForumAMD Stock Plummets 25% in Response to K10 Release - Investors Scared
- ForumAMD Phenom Black Edition can Hit 3Ghz !..very Impressive
- ForumAMD chief condemns Intel 'abuses'
- Forume6300 core 2 duo vs AMD 64x2 4600
- ForumHelp with choosing the right stuff
- ForumAMD Cuts Prices On Athlon XP Processors
- ForumAM2 Processor Prices
- ForumFlawed - Analysis: Retail prices of AMD processors contin...
- ForumShould I only consider AMD graphics cards for my AMD processor ?
- ForumProcessor Prices
- ForumThermaltake 850w PCI-E question
- ForumNew AMD road map
- Forumnew processor that the fastest chip ever
- ForumAMD Athlon 1.7 Ghz... Whats a good mobo 4 it?
- More resources
!