Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
I hate it when developers never bother to officially announce that they've
abandoned their projects so I will do better:
Dungeon City (D20-based Angband variant) is dead!
Reason: lost interest, lack of time
SF RPG Netbook (collection of common SF fluff, technology, critters etc.
meant to be used as a source for SF RPG developers) is dead!
Reason: It was a misguided idea.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
copx wrote:
> SF RPG Netbook (collection of common SF fluff, technology, critters etc.
> meant to be used as a source for SF RPG developers) is dead!
> Reason: It was a misguided idea.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
"konijn_" <konijn@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1120731631.434932.92320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Uhmm, I wouldnt mind if you would send me the latest version though of
> the SF RPG Netbook.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:08:25 +0200, "copx" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>"konijn_" <konijn@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>news:1120731631.434932.92320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Uhmm, I wouldnt mind if you would send me the latest version though of
>> the SF RPG Netbook.
>
>Done.
Well, if you're willing to share what you've finished, I'd like a copy
too, then.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
"R. Dan Henry" <danhenry@inreach.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:2h2uc1lmp2nmrh2b3bfqjrcqvv76mj1i5m@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:08:25 +0200, "copx" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"konijn_" <konijn@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>news:1120731631.434932.92320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>> Uhmm, I wouldnt mind if you would send me the latest version though of
>>> the SF RPG Netbook.
>>
>>Done.
>
> Well, if you're willing to share what you've finished, I'd like a copy
> too, then.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
copx wrote:
> "R. Dan Henry" <danhenry@inreach.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:2h2uc1lmp2nmrh2b3bfqjrcqvv76mj1i5m@4ax.com...
>
>>On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:08:25 +0200, "copx" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"konijn_" <konijn@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>>news:1120731631.434932.92320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>Uhmm, I wouldnt mind if you would send me the latest version though of
>>>>the SF RPG Netbook.
>>>
>>>Done.
>>
>>Well, if you're willing to share what you've finished, I'd like a copy
>>too, then.
>
>
> Sent.
>
I can put a copy at roguelikedevelopment.org if you'de like.
> copx
>
>
--
Björn Bergström
roguelike development [http://roguelikedevelopment.org]
dweller - cellphone roguelike [http://roguelikedevelopment.org/dweller]
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
On 2005-07-10 13:22:25, "copx" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> "R. Dan Henry" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:2h2uc1lmp2nmrh2b3bfqjrcqvv76mj1i5m@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:08:25 +0200, "copx" wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"konijn_" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> >>news:1120731631.434932.92320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >>> Uhmm, I wouldnt mind if you would send me the latest version though of
> >>> the SF RPG Netbook.
> >>
> >>Done.
> >
> > Well, if you're willing to share what you've finished, I'd like a copy
> > too, then.
>
> Sent.
>
> copx
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
"The Fury" <thefurry@hvc.rr.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
newsb12kd$2v27$1@news.vol.cz...
[snip]
> I would like a copy as well
Believe me it's not even worth the download. The project died very early so
the book has very little content.
If the book had some real value I would have uploaded it somewhere.
Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.development (More info?)
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:46:48 +0200, "copx" <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:
>Believe me it's not even worth the download. The project died very early so
>the book has very little content.
>If the book had some real value I would have uploaded it somewhere.
Thanks for sending me a copy, but I have to agree. It has so little
content that there are tons of better sources out there, including
every single self-published-on-the-internet sci-fi RPG rules set out
there. It isn't worthless, but the ease of finding far more extensive
material, reasonably well-organized, in the age of Google, makes
distribution pretty pointless.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.