No, I wouldn't call a 3kg D800 a lightweight. Its a desktop replacement notebook. And yes, from my experience lower spec'd 'other' notebooks often beat higher spec'd Sager notebooks. (e.g. my usual example of my old 1.7GHz I8200 M9 beating a Sager 2.4GHz P4, M9 system in 3D Games), but that is beside the point.
the extra kg definitely makes the D800 a lot more portable which I would rather have than a big, hot, noisy P4.
<<<I'm sure there's some creeky, warpy Dells, Toshs, etc...around as well. They all aren't perfect.>>>
Yes. Of course there are - hence I "generalized". In terms of averages, Sagers are not constructed as well as the majority of current-day Dell/Tosh/Compaq notebooks.
I owned a Sager 56xx for a while before I sent it back. The LCD on that was quite good, certainly not bad but not "WOW!". It's build quality was shocking - I thought others were exagerating, but they weren't. As far as LCDs go, IBM, Sharp, Samsung, Hitachi are the most common notebook LCD Manufacturers. Sharp are generally considered the best, at the moment, Samsung are the worst, and Hitachi and IBM are mid-range. The thing is they make different models, and the LCDs on the majority of the Sagers - especially the big LCDs - are usually low resolutions, and lower quality to the Sagers with smaller displays, and other notebooks.
RaPTuRe
Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk?