I have an AMD Athlon 600 mhz chip...want upgrade to 1.x something. Is the difference in horsepower between 1.0 & 1.2
worth the cost difference?
Also which AMD chip should I get? Thunderbird?
Which MB?
Thank you!
In my opinion the price difference is not worth it. In theory the 1.2 is 20% faster in clock speed then the 1.0, but it is not 20% faster in performance.
If you plan on gaming, using a high end video card will make more of a difference then a 1.0 -> 1.2Ghz. If you plan on using a Gforce2 MX or lesser card, the card will limit the performance of the machine at either clock speed.
Get the 1.0Ghz. My opinion only.....
<font color=blue>This is a Forum, not a playground. Treat it with Respect.</font color=blue>
I recently debated the same decision and although I haven't made my purchase yet, based on current prices, I would go for the 1GHz instead of the 1.2GHz.
The price differential (approximately $50) simply isn't worth the extra juice. Additionally, the performance boost is only theoretical; in most real world applications, you probably will not notice that much of a difference.
As somebody else said, you'd be better off putting that extra money into some other component, such as a better video card, which will give you a more noticeable performance boost.
Get the 1.13 with the 266 fsb. You will find that from 1 to 1.2 not much difference but when comparing 200fsb to 266 fsb there is a real difference ( memory bandwith)
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.