Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.nethack (
More info?)
Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
> Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>
>> I disagree. [1]
>
>> [1] Can you remember the context of this article based on my previous
>> sentence *without* looking at the parent article?
>
> I don't have to, since Google Groups Beta presents my article right above
> yours, but yes, since you're answering my most recent contribution to
> this thread, I managed to know with what you were disagreeing without
> looking back. I did, after all, lavish several precious seconds _writing_
> that with which you disagree, and while I'm old, and slowly but surely
> becoming senile, my memory isn't so bad yet that I can't remember my own
> writing a day later.
Well, I'm sure everyone else can see my point; especially those that
*didn't* write the message to which I responded. In most cases when
reading usenet, one doesn't want to see articles which one has already
read.
I suspect even you might agree with me if this wasn't part of your silly
vendetta with David.
--
Benjamin Lewis
I regret to say that we of the FBI are powerless to act in cases of
oral-genital intimacy, unless it has in some way obstructed interstate
commerce. -- J. Edgar Hoover