Question about dire apes

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about TSR,
I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. If you
disagree with my claim that TSR's cronies will carry the product of its
work into the future, even after TSR itself is long gone, then read no
further. We must face the undeniable fact that TSR, in its infinite
wisdom, has decided to appropriate sacred symbols for infernal,
disgusting purposes. (Actually, there is a certain Burkean prudence that
animates people like me to force it into deserved bankruptcy, but that's
not important now.) Do you ever get the feeling that TSR's
animadversions have no redeeming value? Well, you should, because TSR
will probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all
criticism. It will put me down as "caustic" or "sleazy". That's its
standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except
the most fawning praise. It strikes me as amusing that TSR complains
about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does
nothing but complain.

TSR's pals are so ready to exploit the masses that their expositions are
laughable. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue
here: TSR's capricious epithets. It would be bad enough if TSR's
adulators were merely trying to permit jaundiced hostes generis humani
to rise to positions of leadership and authority. But their attempts to
replace our natural soul with an artificial one are just plain
insensitive. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in
being tragic. TSR would do well to realize that they never discerned any
virtue in being warped.

I can easily see TSR performing the following stentorian, hideous acts.
First, it will institutionalize antiheroism through systematic violence,
distorted religion, and dubious science. Then, it will make our lives an
endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real
benefits to our health and happiness. I do not profess to know how
likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct
possibility to be kept in mind. TSR's ballyhoos are like an enormous
anti-intellectualism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that
structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must do
something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on
TSR's part to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence,
because TSR uses the word "microclimatological" without ever having
taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. Organizations that are
too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
Our goal must now be to show TSR how it is as wrong as wrong can be. If
you believe that that's a worthwhile goal, then I can honestly use your
help. Let me hear from you.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Jasin Zujovic wrote:

> So can we get a link to the rant generator you used or what?

Agreed. Share the wealth.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Werebat's million monkeys spewed:
<snip>

Very very poor. You need a better generator, my mind fogged up before
the end of the first paragraph.

I do find it amusing you actually snagged someone with it though...

- Justsiaur
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

ranpoirier@cox.net wrote:

> Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about TSR,
> I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. If you
> disagree with my claim that TSR's cronies will carry the product of its
> work into the future, even after TSR itself is long gone, then read no
> further. We must face the undeniable fact that TSR, in its infinite
> wisdom, has decided to appropriate sacred symbols for infernal,
> disgusting purposes. (Actually, there is a certain Burkean prudence that
> animates people like me to force it into deserved bankruptcy, but that's
> not important now.) Do you ever get the feeling that TSR's
> animadversions have no redeeming value? Well, you should, because TSR
> will probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all
> criticism. It will put me down as "caustic" or "sleazy". That's its
> standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except
> the most fawning praise. It strikes me as amusing that TSR complains
> about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does
> nothing but complain.
>
> TSR's pals are so ready to exploit the masses that their expositions are
> laughable. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue
> here: TSR's capricious epithets. It would be bad enough if TSR's
> adulators were merely trying to permit jaundiced hostes generis humani
> to rise to positions of leadership and authority. But their attempts to
> replace our natural soul with an artificial one are just plain
> insensitive. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in
> being tragic. TSR would do well to realize that they never discerned any
> virtue in being warped.
>
> I can easily see TSR performing the following stentorian, hideous acts.
> First, it will institutionalize antiheroism through systematic violence,
> distorted religion, and dubious science. Then, it will make our lives an
> endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real
> benefits to our health and happiness. I do not profess to know how
> likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct
> possibility to be kept in mind. TSR's ballyhoos are like an enormous
> anti-intellectualism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that
> structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must do
> something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on
> TSR's part to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence,
> because TSR uses the word "microclimatological" without ever having
> taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. Organizations that are
> too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
> Our goal must now be to show TSR how it is as wrong as wrong can be. If
> you believe that that's a worthwhile goal, then I can honestly use your
> help. Let me hear from you.

So can we get a link to the rant generator you used or what?


--
Jasin Zujovic
jzujovic@inet.hr
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:10:07 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:

>then I can honestly use your help.

You certainly need help from *someone*, but I don't think you'll find the
help you need on the internet.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Probst bprobst@netspace.net.au
Melbourne, Australia MSTie #72759
"He's going to use that Guinea Pig as a guinea pig!"
ASL FAQ http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Mere moments before death, Bruce Probst hastily scrawled:
>On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:10:07 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>then I can honestly use your help.
>
>You certainly need help from *someone*, but I don't think you'll find the
>help you need on the internet.

He found you, didn't he?



Ed Chauvin IV

--
DISCLAIMER : WARNING: RULE # 196 is X-rated in that to calculate L,
use X = [(C2/10)^2], and RULE # 193 which is NOT meant to be read by
kids, since RULE # 187 EXPLAINS homosexuality mathematically, using
modifier G @ 11.

"I always feel left out when someone *else* gets killfiled."
--Terry Austin
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hong Ooi wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:07:17 +0100, Jasin Zujovic <jzujovic@inet.hr>
wrote:
>
> >
> >So can we get a link to the rant generator you used or what?
>
> http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

For the record, I appologize to anyone on livejournal who is spammed by
this thing soon. I posted one of them on my lj and it's spreading like
oral herpes at a rolling stones concert.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

In article <1109959197.988594.203290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Justisaur <justisaur@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>Werebat's million monkeys spewed:
><snip>
>
>Very very poor. You need a better generator, my mind fogged up before
>the end of the first paragraph.
>
>I do find it amusing you actually snagged someone with it though...

Then he has succeeded in his trollhood. This time.
--
"Yo' ideas need to be thinked befo' they are say'd" - Ian Lamb, age 3.5
http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~dalamb/ qucis->cs to reply (it's a long story...)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Anivair wrote:
> Hong Ooi wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:07:17 +0100, Jasin Zujovic <jzujovic@inet.hr>
>
> wrote:
>
>>>So can we get a link to the rant generator you used or what?
>>
>>http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
>
>
> For the record, I appologize to anyone on livejournal who is spammed by
> this thing soon. I posted one of them on my lj and it's spreading like
> oral herpes at a rolling stones concert.

I'm surprised it hasn't already made the rounds. It's been around for
years.

What does "Burkean" mean?

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:07:17 +0100, Jasin Zujovic <jzujovic@inet.hr> wrote:

>
>So can we get a link to the rant generator you used or what?

http://www.pakin.org/complaint/


--
Hong Ooi | "COUNTERSRTIKE IS AN REAL-TIME
hong@zipworld.com.au | STRATEGY GAME!!!"
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- RR
Sydney, Australia |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

"Werebat" <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote in message
news:5sPVd.35878$755.22679@lakeread05...
>
> Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about TSR, I
> have a number of things to say that you may find useful. If you disagree
> with my claim that TSR's cronies will carry the product of its work into
> the future, even after TSR itself is long gone, then read no further. We
> must face the undeniable fact that TSR, in its infinite wisdom, has
> decided to appropriate sacred symbols for infernal, disgusting purposes.
> (Actually, there is a certain Burkean prudence that animates people like
> me to force it into deserved bankruptcy, but that's not important now.) Do
> you ever get the feeling that TSR's animadversions have no redeeming
> value? Well, you should, because TSR will probably respond to this letter
> just like it responds to all criticism. It will put me down as "caustic"
> or "sleazy". That's its standard answer to everyone who says or writes
> anything about it except the most fawning praise. It strikes me as amusing
> that TSR complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news
> flash! It does nothing but complain.
>
> TSR's pals are so ready to exploit the masses that their expositions are
> laughable. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue
> here: TSR's capricious epithets. It would be bad enough if TSR's adulators
> were merely trying to permit jaundiced hostes generis humani to rise to
> positions of leadership and authority. But their attempts to replace our
> natural soul with an artificial one are just plain insensitive. Ancient
> Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. TSR would do
> well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being warped.
>
> I can easily see TSR performing the following stentorian, hideous acts.
> First, it will institutionalize antiheroism through systematic violence,
> distorted religion, and dubious science. Then, it will make our lives an
> endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real
> benefits to our health and happiness. I do not profess to know how likely
> is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be
> kept in mind. TSR's ballyhoos are like an enormous
> anti-intellectualism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that
> structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must do
> something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on
> TSR's part to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, because
> TSR uses the word "microclimatological" without ever having taken the time
> to look it up in the dictionary. Organizations that are too lazy to get
> their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. Our goal must now
> be to show TSR how it is as wrong as wrong can be. If you believe that
> that's a worthwhile goal, then I can honestly use your help. Let me hear
> from you.
>

Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Rivercat wrote:

> "Werebat" <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:5sPVd.35878$755.22679@lakeread05...
>
>>Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about TSR, I
>>have a number of things to say that you may find useful. If you disagree
>>with my claim that TSR's cronies will carry the product of its work into
>>the future, even after TSR itself is long gone, then read no further. We
>>must face the undeniable fact that TSR, in its infinite wisdom, has
>>decided to appropriate sacred symbols for infernal, disgusting purposes.
>>(Actually, there is a certain Burkean prudence that animates people like
>>me to force it into deserved bankruptcy, but that's not important now.) Do
>>you ever get the feeling that TSR's animadversions have no redeeming
>>value? Well, you should, because TSR will probably respond to this letter
>>just like it responds to all criticism. It will put me down as "caustic"
>>or "sleazy". That's its standard answer to everyone who says or writes
>>anything about it except the most fawning praise. It strikes me as amusing
>>that TSR complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news
>>flash! It does nothing but complain.
>>
>>TSR's pals are so ready to exploit the masses that their expositions are
>>laughable. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue
>>here: TSR's capricious epithets. It would be bad enough if TSR's adulators
>>were merely trying to permit jaundiced hostes generis humani to rise to
>>positions of leadership and authority. But their attempts to replace our
>>natural soul with an artificial one are just plain insensitive. Ancient
>>Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. TSR would do
>>well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being warped.
>>
>>I can easily see TSR performing the following stentorian, hideous acts.
>>First, it will institutionalize antiheroism through systematic violence,
>>distorted religion, and dubious science. Then, it will make our lives an
>>endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real
>>benefits to our health and happiness. I do not profess to know how likely
>>is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be
>>kept in mind. TSR's ballyhoos are like an enormous
>>anti-intellectualism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that
>>structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must do
>>something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on
>>TSR's part to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, because
>>TSR uses the word "microclimatological" without ever having taken the time
>>to look it up in the dictionary. Organizations that are too lazy to get
>>their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. Our goal must now
>>be to show TSR how it is as wrong as wrong can be. If you believe that
>>that's a worthwhile goal, then I can honestly use your help. Let me hear
>>from you.
>>
>
>
> Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.

KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?

OH NO!!!

Now I'll miss out on all of those valuable answers and clever ideas that
Rivercat is always coming up with as replies to posts about D&D...
Well, I sure have learned MY lesson today.

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>Rivercat wrote:
>>
>> Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>
>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>
>OH NO!!!
>

Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
MYSELF, now that would have been different.


--
Hong Ooi | "COUNTERSRTIKE IS AN REAL-TIME
hong@zipworld.com.au | STRATEGY GAME!!!"
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- RR
Sydney, Australia |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hong Ooi wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Rivercat wrote:
>>
>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>
>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>
>>OH NO!!!
>>
>
>
> Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
> MYSELF, now that would have been different.

Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>Hong Ooi wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>
>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>
>>>OH NO!!!
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>> MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>
>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.

Liar

*plonk*


--
Hong Ooi | "COUNTERSRTIKE IS AN REAL-TIME
hong@zipworld.com.au | STRATEGY GAME!!!"
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- RR
Sydney, Australia |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hong Ooi wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>>
>>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>>
>>>>OH NO!!!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>>>MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>>
>>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.
>
>
> Liar

Pot. Kettle. Black.

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:28:38 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>Hong Ooi wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>>>
>>>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>>>
>>>>>OH NO!!!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>>>>MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>>>
>>>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>>>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.
>>
>>
>> Liar
>
>Pot. Kettle. Black.

Are you implying blacks smoke pot in kettles?

Racist **PIG!**

*plonk*


--
Hong Ooi | "COUNTERSRTIKE IS AN REAL-TIME
hong@zipworld.com.au | STRATEGY GAME!!!"
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- RR
Sydney, Australia |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hong Ooi wrote:

> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:28:38 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OH NO!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>>>>>MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>>>>
>>>>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>>>>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.
>>>
>>>
>>>Liar
>>
>>Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
>
> Are you implying blacks smoke pot in kettles?
>
> Racist **PIG!**
>
> *plonk*

This word, "plonk" -- I do not think it means what you think it means.

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:43:52 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>Hong Ooi wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:28:38 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>OH NO!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>>>>>>MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>>>>>
>>>>>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>>>>>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Liar
>>>
>>>Pot. Kettle. Black.
>>
>>
>> Are you implying blacks smoke pot in kettles?
>>
>> Racist **PIG!**
>>
>> *plonk*
>
>This word, "plonk" -- I do not think it means what you think it means.

Of course it means what I think it means. It means I take a drink every
time you follow up to one of my posts.

PS *plonk*


--
Hong Ooi | "COUNTERSRTIKE IS AN REAL-TIME
hong@zipworld.com.au | STRATEGY GAME!!!"
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- RR
Sydney, Australia |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hong Ooi wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:43:52 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:28:38 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:37:44 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hong Ooi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:36:45 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Rivercat wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Congratulations, for this piece of nonsence, you have been kill filed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>KILL FILED?!? By *RIVERCAT*?!?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>OH NO!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yeah. Now if you had been plonked by someone _worthwhile_, such as...
>>>>>>>MYSELF, now that would have been different.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Right, but since you claimed to have done so already, and obviously have
>>>>>>not, your word on this matter cannot be trusted.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Liar
>>>>
>>>>Pot. Kettle. Black.
>>>
>>>
>>>Are you implying blacks smoke pot in kettles?
>>>
>>>Racist **PIG!**
>>>
>>>*plonk*
>>
>>This word, "plonk" -- I do not think it means what you think it means.
>
>
> Of course it means what I think it means. It means I take a drink every
> time you follow up to one of my posts.
>
> PS *plonk*

But *I'M* dshrinkin' evrey time ya fllwup ta onuf MYH p'(hic)hoshtsh...

- Ron ^*^
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

In article <t4lj21th2iv286kotvtg4rk79fdhlvm0bh@4ax.com>,
Hong Ooi <hong@zipworld.com.au> wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:43:52 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>This word, "plonk" -- I do not think it means what you think it means.
>
>Of course it means what I think it means. It means I take a drink every
>time you follow up to one of my posts.
>
>PS *plonk*

Methinks you have too good an excuse to plonk people.

Plonking would surely be more significant if it were someone who *never*
plonks people (before, at least).
--
"Yo' ideas need to be thinked befo' they are say'd" - Ian Lamb, age 3.5
http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~dalamb/ qucis->cs to reply (it's a long story...)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

David Alex Lamb wrote:
> In article <t4lj21th2iv286kotvtg4rk79fdhlvm0bh@4ax.com>,
> Hong Ooi <hong@zipworld.com.au> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:43:52 -0500, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>This word, "plonk" -- I do not think it means what you think it means.
>>
>>Of course it means what I think it means. It means I take a drink every
>>time you follow up to one of my posts.
>>
>>PS *plonk*
>
>
> Methinks you have too good an excuse to plonk people.
>
> Plonking would surely be more significant if it were someone who *never*
> plonks people (before, at least).

Most cultures do attach a certain special significance to one's first
plonking.

- Ron ^*^
 

Latest posts