Doesn't it make sense to increase the surface area of the core to maybe double it's current size and giving the internals more space to breathe inside and at the same time more surface area to make contact with heatsink and as a result lower temperatures?
Surely they thought of that but went with the current design for a reason.
Anyone?
Beer is the devil's piss.<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by hatimh on 06/06/01 10:36 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
They didn't cover the core with a heat spreader like Intel does. I don't know why, cause the k6-2 had one, but I think it's better for cooling because the heat sink is right against the core.
Aklein
It's raining outside, and my lawn has grown a foot overnight!
The problem with increasing the size of the core is this.
Less CPUs per wafer are created thus reducing production and increasing cost.
Hitting the higher clock speeds would not be possible if the CPU was twice as large. CPU do not need “room to breathe” They need the electrons to travel as short a distance as possible. Every die shrink = faster clock speed.
Who cares how hot they run. Athlons are rated to 90c. Temp is a nonissue.
Thx & Cya
<font color=green>I may go to <font color=red>hell</font color=red> but at least I won't get lonely</font color=green>
Listen to LowlyPawn, and also consider that silicon is a semiconductor, if they were to, say, split the processor and then interconnect the parts, the interconnects would produce heat as well.
more distance to travel=more resistance. more resistance = more power consumed. That = heat. Smaller cores are actually cooler than larger ones.
Actually another consideration is that the core is the smallest it can be. The current P4 does not have all the bits it should have because it would not fit. Once the cpu is built on .13 micron technology rather than .18 it will all fit again.
Generally, the smaller a unit, the less power consumed.
-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details
Exactly! Mine says 64 but probe is 10 degrees high. If your computer runs stable who cares how hot the CPU is. I could lower my temps with my loud a$$ delta but it’s stable with a quieter fan. If my CPU burns out in 5 years instead of 10 who cares. It will be so out dated by then.
Thx & Cya
<font color=green>I may go to <font color=red>hell</font color=red> but at least I won't get lonely</font color=green>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.